postfix-2.0.16-1 was added as id #17 to the fedora update list, this was to fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108960
There has been some limited testing by users reporting the bug who report success, but additional testing would be prudent. The fundamental change was to move from the .14 to .16 minor upstream rev to pick up an upstream bug fix.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
"John" == John Dennis jdennis@redhat.com writes:
John> postfix-2.0.16-1 was added as id #17 to the fedora update list, John> this was to fix: John> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108960
John> There has been some limited testing by users reporting the bug John> who report success, but additional testing would be prudent. The John> fundamental change was to move from the .14 to .16 minor John> upstream rev to pick up an upstream bug fix. -- John Dennis John> jdennis@redhat.com
I'm running into that problem with a postfix 2.0.11 on a RH9 machine. Can you put the .src.rpm for the 2.0.16 version up somewhere so I can recompile for 9 and try it there? (the url in the bugzilla only has a binary rpm for fedora in it).
It currently has the 2.0.11 recompiled from the fedora-core-1 version.
As a side note, what are the chances that fedora will switch to postfix as the default MTA in core2 or beyond?
kevin