Can PackageKit\Yum bemade to auto de-select broken pkgs. So I would end up with No Icon sitting there. Currently I have 59pkgs in the PK-Icon. None can be installed.
From PK---------------- libcrypto.so.8()(64bit) is needed by package evolution-data-server-2.27.91-1.fc12.x86_64 libssl.so.8()(64bit) is needed by package evolution-data-server-2.27.91-1.fc12.x86_64 libaudit.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package 1:gdm-2.27.90-1.fc12.x86_64 libaudit.so.0()(64bit) is needed by package nscd-2.10.90-15.x86_64 ------------------------
From yum --skip-broken update----------- http://www.fpaste.org/Pwic/
On 30/08/09 18:32, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/29/2009 03:00 PM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
Can PackageKit\Yum bemade to auto de-select broken pkgs. So I would end up with No Icon sitting there.
--snipp
Richard Hughes is not in this list.
Rahul
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-August/msg00829.html
On 08/31/2009 01:22 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-August/msg00829.html
Ok. I missed that however you should still try and report bugs to bugzilla. The amount of mails that one has to track otherwise, is pretty brutal.
Rahul
On 30/08/09 22:50, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/31/2009 01:22 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-August/msg00829.html
Ok. I missed that however you should still try and report bugs to bugzilla. The amount of mails that one has to track otherwise, is pretty brutal.
Rahul
But, before reporting a bug. It's nice to check, whether it's some conf just has to be edited.
-
Frank Murphy -
Rahul Sundaram