Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: file "repomd.xml" was not found in metalink

[Felix Miata]

repeatedly results from:

dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=31

from a freshly upgraded F30-32. After $SUBJECT 2-3 times I tried disabling
updates-testing, then updates-testing and updates, but no change in behavior.

[Samuel Sieb]

On 10/29/19 4:17 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> repeatedly results from:
>
> dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=31
>
> from a freshly upgraded F30-32. After $SUBJECT 2-3 times I tried disabling
> updates-testing, then updates-testing and updates, but no change in behavior.

By "F30-32", do you mean a 32-bit install?  If so, did you miss all the 
discussion about 32-bit repos going away?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Noi686Repositories

[Felix Miata]

Samuel Sieb composed on 2019-10-29 17:00 (UTC-0700):
> Felix Miata wrote:
> > repeatedly results from:
> > dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=31
> > from a freshly upgraded F30-32. After $SUBJECT 2-3 times I tried disabling
> > updates-testing, then updates-testing and updates, but no change in behavior.
> By "F30-32", do you mean a 32-bit install?

I did miss all such discussion. Whatever doesn't show up on the kde list or this
list I don't see unless via search result.
> If so, did you miss all the 
> discussion about 32-bit repos going away?
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Noi686Repositories

I've been wondering a long time when that would happen.  When did 32bit repos
actually go? Neither that URL nor the bug it refers to indicate a date AFAICT.

[Samuel Sieb]

On 10/29/19 5:32 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> Samuel Sieb composed on 2019-10-29 17:00 (UTC-0700):
> > By "F30-32", do you mean a 32-bit install?
>
> I did miss all such discussion. Whatever doesn't show up on the kde list or this
> list I don't see unless via search result.

I thought it had come up on this one, but maybe it was just -devel.
> > If so, did you miss all the
> > discussion about 32-bit repos going away?
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Noi686Repositories
>
> I've been wondering a long time when that would happen.  When did 32bit repos
> actually go? Neither that URL nor the bug it refers to indicate a date AFAICT.

Targeted release: Fedora 31

[Felix Miata]

Samuel Sieb composed on 2019-10-29 17:47 (UTC-0700):
> Felix Miata wrote:
> > I've been wondering a long time when that would happen.  When did 32bit repos
> > actually go? Neither that URL nor the bug it refers to indicate a date AFAICT.
> Targeted release: Fedora 31

Ambiguous. 2019-10-31 would answer the question, if 2019-10-31 were the official
F31 release date, and that's when those repos ceased to be available.

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 21:00 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Samuel Sieb composed on 2019-10-29 17:47 (UTC-0700):
> > Felix Miata wrote:
> > > I've been wondering a long time when that would happen.  When did 32bit repos
> > > actually go? Neither that URL nor the bug it refers to indicate a date AFAICT.
> >
> > Targeted release: Fedora 31
>
> Ambiguous. 2019-10-31 would answer the question, if 2019-10-31 were the official
> F31 release date, and that's when those repos ceased to be available.

No, it was much earlier. We stopped generating them quite early in the
F31 cycle, I think around the time it branched.