NetworkManager randomly dying?
by Wes Shull
Has anyone else observed NetworkManager dying on them randomly? I say
randomly because I don't see a pattern to it yet; no doubt it is
deterministic in some way.
I'm current on rawhide, including NetworkManager-0.2-1.
Nothing spectacular happens to indicate its death; I just happen to
occasionally notice the network is down, and...
# service NetworkManager status
NetworkManager dead but pid file exists
The only remotely useful thing I can find in /var/log/messages:
Aug 31 00:00:22 ip68-110-7-34 NetworkManager: AUTO: Best wired device =
(null)
Aug 31 00:00:22 ip68-110-7-34 NetworkManager: AUTO: Best wireless device =
(null) (null)
Aug 31 00:00:22 ip68-110-7-34 NetworkManager:
nm_state_modification_monitor(): beginning activation for device '(null)'
with this additional line after those in /var/log/debug (to which I have
syslog dumping *.debug):
Aug 31 00:00:22 ip68-110-7-34 NetworkManager:
nm_device_activation_cancel(eth1): canceled
I'm planning on doing further debugging, but first maybe someone needs to
add the NetworkManager package to bugzilla? Or is it there and I'm just
blind?
--wes
19 years, 10 months
Status of htree?
by Steve Bergman
Eeek! My previous post had a subject of:
Subject: (no subject)
I'm tempted to blame Evolution, but I fear it was my fault. ;-/
Anyways...
What is the status of htree these days? Does the current rawhide create
its filesystems with dir_index enabled during installation? What are
the relative advantages and disadvantages of htree at the current time?
Thanks (again ;-),
Steve Bergman
19 years, 10 months
(no subject)
by Steve Bergman
What is the status of htree these days? Does the current rawhide create
its filesystems with dir_index enabled during installation? What are
the relative advantages and disadvantages of htree at the current time?
Thanks,
Steve Bergman
19 years, 10 months
xorg X11 using i81x drivers is working now
by Jim Shepherd
Just upgraded to the 6.7.99.903-1 release of xorg-X11 that became
available this morning and X is finally working on my PC with i810.
Previously, X would not start when using the i810 driver and I received
the same errors as many others on this list with similar Intel chipsets.
-Jim
19 years, 10 months
Re: Kernel BUG with 533 kernel and JFS (Re: USB System Partially Broken with 533 Kernel?)
by Michel Salim
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:26:36 +0200, David Zeuthen <david(a)fubar.dk> wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 15:07 -0500, Michel Salim wrote:
> > Please note also the 'uba: was not changed' messages that keep
> > appearing. The messages only start when I switch from runlevel S to
> > runlevel 3.. perhaps gamin is being over-verbose?
> >
>
> I think this is actually due to the fact that the hal daemon polls your
> device and the ub driver is overly verbose.
>
Ah, fair enough.
> Another problem: /proc/bus/usb is not being mounted at boot, that might
> explain the lsusb problems?
>
That too, though both are not really serious concerns for me, but thanks :)
I turned off voluntary preemption at boot time and JFS on USB seems
more stable now.. almost as stable as -526. I discovered the problem
initially when using -526, halfway through a DVD->XviD job, I lost
access to the whole external drive. Rebooting to -533 revealed that
the situation is even worse there (until voluntary preemption is
turned off).
Would be nice to have /proc/sys/kernel knobs to control preemption
though. Are those removed by upstream or by Red Hat developers?
(Though since in this case upstream = Ingo who works for Red Hat,
there's not much difference)
Regards,
--
Michel Salim 林智勇
http://salimma.livejournal.com
19 years, 10 months
xorg-x11-903 deps fail: needs libXp
by sean darcy
rpm -Fvh xorg*m
error: Failed dependencies:
libXp.so.6 is needed by xorg-x11-6.7.99.903-1
libXp.so.6 is needed by xorg-x11-tools-6.7.99.903-1
...............................
and libXp is not in xorg-x11-libs.
Is this a spec file problem, or is libXp still needed?
sean
19 years, 10 months
CUPS definately hosed
by Paul F. Johnson
Hi,
I've done another reboot, took ages to get past starting the cups server
(which it eventually did), but looking in var/log/messages, I saw this.
Aug 29 11:56:13 T7 kernel: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x1d2
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: DMA per-cpu:
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: cpu 0 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: Normal per-cpu:
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: cpu 0 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: HighMem per-cpu: empty
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel:
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: Free pages: 880kB (0kB HighMem)
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: Active:96241 inactive:92748 dirty:0
writeback:0 unstable:0 free:220 slab:1861 mapped:188696 pagetables:838
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: DMA free:16kB min:16kB low:32kB high:48kB
active:6468kB inactive:6184kB present:16384kB
Aug 29 11:56:30 T7 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0
Aug 29 11:56:31 T7 kernel: Normal free:864kB min:864kB low:1728kB
high:2592kB active:378496kB inactive:364808kB present:769984kB
Aug 29 11:56:31 T7 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0
Aug 29 11:56:31 T7 kernel: HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:256kB
high:384kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB
Aug 29 11:56:31 T7 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0
Aug 29 11:56:31 T7 kernel: DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB
0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 16kB
Aug 29 11:56:31 T7 kernel: Normal: 0*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 5*32kB 11*64kB
0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 864kB
Aug 29 11:56:31 T7 kernel: HighMem: empty
Aug 29 11:56:31 T7 kernel: Swap cache: add 394473, delete 394454, find
1204/1543, race 0+0
Aug 29 11:56:31 T7 kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 3012 (nscd).
Aug 29 11:56:31 T7 kernel: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x1d2
Aug 29 11:56:32 T7 kernel: DMA per-cpu:
Aug 29 11:56:32 T7 kernel: cpu 0 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1
Aug 29 11:56:32 T7 kernel: cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1
Aug 29 11:56:32 T7 kernel: Normal per-cpu:
Aug 29 11:56:32 T7 kernel: cpu 0 hot: low 32, high 96, batch 16
Aug 29 11:56:32 T7 kernel: cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 32, batch 16
Aug 29 11:56:32 T7 kernel: HighMem per-cpu: empty
Aug 29 11:56:32 T7 kernel:
Aug 29 11:56:32 T7 kernel: Free pages: 840kB (0kB HighMem)
Aug 29 11:56:33 T7 kernel: Active:181407 inactive:7575 dirty:0
writeback:0 unstable:0 free:210 slab:1845 mapped:188772 pagetables:838
Aug 29 11:56:33 T7 kernel: DMA free:16kB min:16kB low:32kB high:48kB
active:12180kB inactive:516kB present:16384kB
Aug 29 11:56:33 T7 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0
Aug 29 11:56:33 T7 kernel: Normal free:824kB min:864kB low:1728kB
high:2592kB active:713448kB inactive:29784kB present:769984kB
Aug 29 11:56:33 T7 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0
Aug 29 11:56:33 T7 kernel: HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:256kB
high:384kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB
Aug 29 11:56:33 T7 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0
Aug 29 11:56:34 T7 kernel: DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB
0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 16kB
Aug 29 11:56:34 T7 kernel: Normal: 0*4kB 3*8kB 0*16kB 3*32kB 11*64kB
0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 824kB
Aug 29 11:56:34 T7 kernel: HighMem: empty
Aug 29 11:56:34 T7 kernel: Swap cache: add 394912, delete 394912, find
1254/1641, race 0+1
Aug 29 11:56:34 T7 kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 3014 (nscd).
Other processes killed include such favourites as modprobe (and that's
it - though it was killed 8 times!).
Is this related to cups and if not, where is it from as I think it
should be in bugzilla rather than my desktop.
Something *is* up with cups though. If I try to use system-config-
printer, the entire machine locks up, lots of HD thrashing and no
action. I have to switch the machine off to get things working again.
Very annoying!
TTFN
Paul
--
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful - and so are we,"
"They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our
people - and neither do we." - George W. Bush, Aug 2004
19 years, 10 months
Error installing dev update
by Phil Schaffner
Running "yum upgrade" generated the following...
Cannot install the dev package: mounted devfs detected.
error: %pre(dev-3.9.1-1) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping dev-3.9.1-1
How does one update the dev package?
Phil
19 years, 10 months
Bizarre warnings with kernel 2.6.8-1.533: uba: was not changed
by Michel Salim
I am using a USB2 external hard drive with kernel 2.6.8-1.533 and keep
getting the following message:
uba: was not changed
where uba is the USB had drive (a JFS partition is on uba1, but the
message appears both before and after the partiiton is mounted)
The message appears at a rate of 1 every other second.
Has anyone seen this? It's rather harmless, but annoying..
Thanks
--
Michel Salim 林智勇
http://salimma.livejournal.com
19 years, 10 months
