test November 2017

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

23 participants
292 discussions

NVIDIA Question
by David St.Clair 17 Jan '22

17 Jan '22

This may be a dumb question, but why can't Redhat distribute NVIDIA binary drivers? In NVIDIA's licence (http://www.nvidia.com/object/nv_swlicense.html) it says: "2.1.2 Linux Exception. Notwithstanding the foregoing terms of Section 2.1.1, SOFTWARE designed exclusively for use on the Linux operating system may be copied and redistributed, provided that the binary files thereof are not modified in any way (except for unzipping of compressed files)." So, what's keeping RedHat from putting the drivers in the distribution? If it's a GPL thing, would it be easy to just download it during installation or at least give the option to the user? Thanks, -- David St.Clair dstclair(a)cs.wcu.edu

10 20

Mouse goes crazy
by Jonathan Villa 17 Jan '22

17 Jan '22

Ok, I have had Yarrow working well for a while now, but yesterday I started experiencing some odd issues with my mouse. All of a sudden it stops working correctly. The only thing that seems to fix is to kill X and run mouse-test, then restart. Any ideas? Also, I have FC 1 running on a desktop which is hooked up to a KVM switch. Whenever I go to another PC, and return, the same thing happens, the mouse goes crazy. ???

8 7

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171028.n.0 changes
by Fedora Branched Report 02 Nov '20

02 Nov '20

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171028.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171028.n.0 ===== SUMMARY ===== Added images: 0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages: 0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages: 0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B ===== ADDED IMAGES ===== ===== DROPPED IMAGES ===== ===== ADDED PACKAGES ===== ===== DROPPED PACKAGES ===== ===== UPGRADED PACKAGES ===== ===== DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =====

1 0

Re: Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen
by Adam Williamson 27 Apr '19

27 Apr '19

On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 15:13 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 11:59:01AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi, folks! A while ago, Xen virtualization functionality was added to > > the criteria and the validation test case set, on the understanding > > that Oracle would provide testing for it (and help fix bugs as they > > arose). > > > > For the last couple of releases we really have not had any such testing > > We had been doing the testing, it just that we (or rather me and > Dariof) seem to get a wind of this at the last minute. Not sure exactly > how to fix that thought. Well, I mean, every few *days* a compose gets nominated for validation testing, and a mail is sent to test-announce. Just check your test- announce archives for mails with "nominated for testing" in their subject lines, and you'll see dozens. Is this not sufficient notification? > > from Oracle. On that basis, I'm proposing we remove this Final > > criterion: > > s/Oracle/Xen Project/ I believe? Perhaps, it's just that it always seemed to be you doing the testing, so they got a bit conflated :) > > "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases providing > > a functional, supported Xen Dom0 and widely used cloud providers > > utilizing Xen." > > > > and change the 'milestone' for the test case - > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt - > > from Final to Optional. > > > > Thoughts? Comments? Thanks! > > I would prefer for it to remain as it is. This is only practical if it's going to be tested, and tested regularly - not *only* on the final release candidate, right before we sign off on the release. It needs to be tested regularly throughout the release cycle, on the composes that are "nominated for testing". Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

7 9

F24 beta virt-install with kickstart fails
by Jos Vos 03 Jul '18

03 Jul '18

Hi, Did anyone succeed in virt-install'ing F24 beta using kickstart (on CentOS 6 host, if that matters)? I see lots of warnings (dracut-initqueue), then the console goes into a slowly filling bar at the bottom (plymouthd!?), then I see lots of "No space left on device" errors, then a dracut emergency shell is started. The generated rdsosreport.txt contains 34284 lines... FWIW, when *not* using kickstart I can install F24 beta on the same system with virt-install fine. Thx, -- -- Jos Vos <jos(a)xos.nl> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204

5 7

Self-introduction: Andrzej P
by Andrzej Prochyra 03 Mar '18

03 Mar '18

Hi I'm interested in helping out with QA. I have been a GNU/Linux user on and off since the late 90s but went all GNU/Linux about 10 years ago. I've been running Fedora as my desktop system for a couple of years and now I'd like to give something back. There are a lot of different tasks listed on the Wiki. What would be something useful/a priority that a beginner could do? My IRC and FAS nickname is andrzejp. Thanks -- Andrzej

2 1

F27 gnome-software updates failing
by Chris Murphy 30 Nov '17

30 Nov '17

I've filed a bug about this here: Fedora 27 offline updates (gnome-software intitiated) are failing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519543 This is on a system upgraded a couple weeks ago with 'dnf system-upgrade' from Fedora 26 to Fedora 27. I've receive a notification there are updatess, so I go into Gnome Software, choose Restart & Upgrade from within Gnome-Software, it reboots and plymouth gives me the updating indication and status, and pretty much immediately I get a reboot. Once rebooted, it's clear the updates have not been applied. [ 6.218141] f27h.localdomain pk-offline-update[815]: percentage 4% [ 6.254059] f27h.localdomain pk-offline-update[815]: percentage 6% [ 6.325118] f27h.localdomain dnf[813]: Error: use 'dnf system-upgrade reboot' to begin the upgrade [ 6.352470] f27h.localdomain systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE [ 6.356239] f27h.localdomain systemd[1]: Failed to start System Upgrade using DNF. [ 6.356570] f27h.localdomain systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service: Unit entered failed state. [ 6.356777] f27h.localdomain systemd[1]: dnf-system-upgrade.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. [ 6.356983] f27h.localdomain systemd[1]: Rebooting: service failed Why is dnf saying to use 'dnf system-upgrade reboot' for a minor update? I'm not asking for an upgrade, that's already been done and it went fine. -- Chris Murphy

1 1

Fedora-Modular 27-20171130.n.1 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 30 Nov '17

30 Nov '17

Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 20/94 (x86_64), 4/19 (i386) ID: 177513 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177513 ID: 177519 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177519 ID: 177533 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177533 ID: 177537 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177537 ID: 177539 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177539 ID: 177540 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177540 ID: 177562 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177562 ID: 177584 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177584 ID: 177585 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177585 ID: 177586 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177586 ID: 177587 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177587 ID: 177589 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177589 ID: 177590 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177590 ID: 177591 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177591 ID: 177592 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177592 ID: 177593 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177593 ID: 177594 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177594 ID: 177595 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177595 ID: 177599 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177599 ID: 177600 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177600 ID: 177603 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177603 ID: 177608 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177608 ID: 177609 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177609 ID: 177622 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177622 Passed openQA tests: 66/94 (x86_64), 15/19 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 3 of 113 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: changes
by Fedora Rawhide Report 30 Nov '17

30 Nov '17

1 0

Fedora 27 RC 1.6 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 30 Nov '17

30 Nov '17

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 7/135 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 165589 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165589 ID: 165612 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165612 ID: 165630 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165630 ID: 165636 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165636 ID: 165642 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165642 ID: 165651 Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165651 ID: 165663 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165663 ID: 177624 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/177624 Soft failed openQA tests: 5/135 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 165664 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165664 ID: 165666 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165666 ID: 165676 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165676 ID: 165703 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165703 ID: 165711 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/165711 Passed openQA tests: 121/135 (x86_64), 22/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 159 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test November 2017