test February 2021

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

40 participants
252 discussions

Self-Introduction: Liu Zixi
by jetsaman＠tuta.io 23 Feb '21

23 Feb '21

Hi, my name is Liu Zi Xi, who is often living in Liaoning, China, but will also go back to Beijing in the holiday, my IRC name and FAS username are Jetsaman, although I am still exploring IRC, which cannot be used in China normally. I learned about the huge community of Fedora through my friend "mengjuntezhandui" on the Internet. We are all users of Fedora for a long time (although I may be younger). I have always been very interested in the Fedora QA, but now I Decide to officially Join it. I can't say that I am good at programming or system packaging, but as a long-time Fedora user (and have used test software or even Rawhide and reporting errors), I think I can use idle time to make the package for the package. QA test and feedback report. I once worked as an editor in oschina (open source China in Chinese, a well-known open source community in China), contributing dozens of articles on the comparison, introduction or recommendation of different open source software; I Also Maintain My Blog Independently, And Use My Spare Time To Upload Some Articles About Software Recommendation and Simple Technology Teaching; In Addition, I have participated in some not very well - known projects, But it is not horns ioning hereFinally. At last ,I must apologize to you, I hope you forgive me unskilled and strange English expression :-) From Jetsaman

1 0

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210223.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 23 Feb '21

23 Feb '21

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210222.0): ID: 786482 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786482 ID: 786489 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786489 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

Proposal to modify: Working Sound Beta Release Criterion
by Lukas Ruzicka 23 Feb '21

23 Feb '21

Hello friends of Fedora, I have been thinking about a proposal to modify the %subj. I have tried several version and I did not like any, so finally I am proposing this text: *Working sound* *The installed system must be able to play back and record audio.* This is a very short and general version, but I believe it supports the following: 1. Playback and recording must work (which we want) 2. You can test on any application you like (The recording test case will recommend Audacity) 3. It does not say that all applications must work, so we should be fine if *some do* What do you think? -- Lukáš Růžička FEDORA QE, RHCE Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> Purkyňova 115 612 45 Brno - Královo Pole lruzicka(a)redhat.com TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>

7 22

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210223.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 23 Feb '21

23 Feb '21

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210222.0): ID: 786468 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786468 ID: 786475 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786475 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

newbie question
by David 23 Feb '21

23 Feb '21

At this present state of Fedora 34 and Rawhide, I see almost the same exact packages getting the same bumps in version numbers, with only the suffix "fc34" and fc35" being the difference. 1 ) Does this just mean that the identical packages are stored on the server in a different directory ? 2 ) Are there any notable differences in the two products at this point ? I assume that since there is Fedora 34 beta-freeze approaching, that Rawhide will in the coming week or weeks have differences that are more noticeable. Right ? If so, which ones ? the kernel ?? git versions of certain packages ? On a personal note, I will likely use Fedora 34 as my only operating system, and no longer use Rawhide, as I feel my brain-capacity has been maxxed-out, with whatever I had hoped to learn from the Rawhide experience. I will likely have several Fedora 34 SSD's with different DE's. That all being said, for the time being I am sadly away from my computer, having to do things on my phone, and a Chromebook. Cheers, David

2 1

Blocker bugs
by pmkellly＠frontier.com 23 Feb '21

23 Feb '21

I'm sitting here thinking about F34 Beta being just two days away and what I have observed in my testing. I must admit being more than a little concerned. I have watched the blocker bugs and my concern stems from the fact that I don't see some troubling ones listed there. Also there doesn't seem to have been any discussion about these. Even if these don't technically qualify as blockers, if they are not fixed. they will certainly send a message to those those installing F34 Beta. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1924908 I know the white screen with the sad face at least appears to be cosmetic, but do we really want that. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1928565 This is apparently one of the alerts that if a user has installed setroubleshoot, they get alerts about every 2 seconds. Even if setroubleshoot was not installed my guess is that the SELinux violations are still occurring. GCC has had trouble for the last three drops. Excuse me, I still have to download 0221 for testing. Our beta's are usually pretty sound, but from what I see these may change that impression. If I have gotten something wrong or missed something please let me know if I am worried for no good reason. Have a Great Day! Pat (tablepc)

3 3

Fedora-IoT-34-20210222.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210220.0): ID: 786325 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786325 ID: 786330 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786330 ID: 786339 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786339 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210220.0): ID: 786315 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786315 Passed openQA tests: 14/16 (x86_64), 13/15 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

Fedora-34-20210222.n.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 22/183 (x86_64), 19/124 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210221.n.0): ID: 785960 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785960 ID: 785963 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785963 ID: 785967 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_database_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785967 ID: 785968 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785968 ID: 786046 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786046 ID: 786047 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfsiso_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786047 ID: 786209 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786209 ID: 786214 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786214 ID: 786216 Test: aarch64 universal support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786216 ID: 786223 Test: aarch64 universal install_iscsi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786223 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210221.n.0): ID: 785935 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785935 ID: 785942 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785942 ID: 785945 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785945 ID: 785946 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785946 ID: 785954 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785954 ID: 785955 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785955 ID: 785956 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785956 ID: 785965 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785965 ID: 785966 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785966 ID: 785969 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785969 ID: 785988 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785988 ID: 785996 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785996 ID: 786004 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786004 ID: 786005 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786005 ID: 786008 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786008 ID: 786009 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786009 ID: 786049 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786049 ID: 786050 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786050 ID: 786057 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786057 ID: 786059 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786059 ID: 786060 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786060 ID: 786071 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786071 ID: 786075 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786075 ID: 786076 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786076 ID: 786125 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786125 ID: 786165 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786165 ID: 786197 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786197 ID: 786205 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786205 ID: 786208 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786208 ID: 786212 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786212 ID: 786228 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786228 Soft failed openQA tests: 7/183 (x86_64), 4/124 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210221.n.0): ID: 785930 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785930 ID: 785931 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785931 ID: 786022 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786022 ID: 786040 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786040 ID: 786052 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786052 ID: 786086 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786086 ID: 786105 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786105 ID: 786112 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786112 ID: 786132 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786132 ID: 786151 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786151 ID: 786152 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786152 Passed openQA tests: 100/124 (aarch64), 152/183 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-34-20210221.n.0): ID: 786095 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786095 ID: 786098 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786098 ID: 786189 Test: aarch64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786189 ID: 786190 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786190 ID: 786224 Test: aarch64 universal install_repository_http_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786224 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 2 of 307 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: System load changed from 0.33 to 0.21 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785080#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785923#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 0.13 to 0.35 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785089#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785932#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.80 to 0.50 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785132#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785975#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 0.80 to 0.98 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785151#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785994#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: Used mem changed from 1024 MiB to 773 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785168#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786011#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 0.56 to 0.74 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785169#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786012#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.28 to 0.14 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785194#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786037#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi: System load changed from 0.20 to 0.08 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785205#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786048#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal: System load changed from 0.21 to 0.08 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785312#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786155#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 universal install_package_set_minimal@uefi: System load changed from 0.10 to 0.24 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/785368#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786211#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

criterion proposal: prevent services timing out on system shutdown
by Kamil Paral 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

*Why* The recent spice-vdagent update causes all virtual machines to take 90 seconds longer on every shutdown/reboot: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813667 The service hangs when systemd tries to stop it, and systemd then kills it after a 90 second timeout expires. This is a recurring pattern, I saw services blocking shutdown/reboot in the past, and so far we haven't been able to do anything about it from a blocker perspective. I think that for cases where the problem occurs very frequently or every time, we should have a way to block the release until it's fixed. I find it a very poor experience to wait 90+ seconds for machine reboot/shutdown. Much poorer than, say, a crashing desktop application (which we block on), because that application can be replaced with a different one. System services mostly can't be replaced, and certainly not by a general user. *Proposal* So I propose to amend the "System services" criterion [1]: ``` All system services present after installation with one of the release-blocking package sets must start properly, unless they require hardware which is not present. ``` with something like this: ``` All system services present after installation with one of the release-blocking package sets must start properly, unless they require hardware which is not present. *All system services present after installation with one of the release-blocking package sets must not time out frequently or regularly when they are being stopped during system reboot/shutdown.* ``` The way it is written, the mentioned bug would be a conditional violation of that criterion (applies only to VMs) and we'd need to use our judgement to determine whether it's a blocker. Thoughts? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Final_Release_Criteria#System_serv…

9 18

Fedora-IoT-35-20210222.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 22 Feb '21

22 Feb '21

Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 4/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210217.0): ID: 786236 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786236 ID: 786245 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786245 ID: 786251 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786251 ID: 786259 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786259 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210217.0): ID: 786241 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786241 ID: 786246 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786246 ID: 786255 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786255 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210217.0): ID: 786231 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786231 Passed openQA tests: 12/16 (x86_64), 11/15 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210217.0): ID: 786242 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786242 ID: 786256 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/786256 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
26
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test February 2021