On 2013-06-21 10:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:37:01 -0700 Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com wrote:
So, just a phrasing thing, the criteria are mostly written in the form 'XXX must be the case', not 'XXX is added to the blocker list'. So perhaps:
'All bugs deemed by FESCo to block the milestone release must be fixed.'
Would be enough. My suggestion used the terms 'issues' and 'addressed' as weasel words we've found useful before - in the case where we work around a bug, rather than fixing it, we can call that 'addressing' it
- but I don't really mind writing it that way and just using Common
Sense (tm). I think specifying FESCo's current decision-making mechanism - majority vote - in the criterion is a mistake, as it's at least theoretically plausible that FESCo could change its decision-making mechanism in future, and then the criterion would need to be updated for no good reason. All that matters to the blocker process is that 'FESCo Hath Deemed It Thus'. The mechanism by which FESCo Deems things is out of scope.
Sure. Works for me.
As there were no objections, I'm adding this to the Alpha page as I create the F20 criteria pages. Thanks!