2009/1/29 Tom London selinux@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/29 Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com:
2009/1/29 Jerry Amundson jamundso@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com wrote:
I have two F11 systems with similar packages. On both I have fedora-release 10.91-1 Fedora release files fedora-release-notes 10.0.0-1 Release Notes for Fedora 10 livna-release 1-1 rpm.livna.org repository files rpmfusion-free-release 10.90-1 RPM Fusion (free) Repository Configuration rpmfusion-nonfree-release 10.90-1 RPM Fusion (nonfree) Repository Configuration
but Webmin reports one as: Operating system Redhat Linux Fedora 10.90 and the other as: Operating system Redhat Linux Fedora 10.91
Why???
Do both report 10.91 at boot? (the progress text bar or graphic spinny thing)
If so, then the webmin list is two doors down, on the left...
jerry
jerry
I forgot to check the progress bar, that reports 10.90 on one system.Why?? I re-checked this morning and I have fedora-release-10.91-1.noarch installed. Funny....
-- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag
I cheched fedora-release in etc and it says: Fedora release 10.91 (Rawhide) Shall I file a bug???
Did you possibly install these packages in a different order on these systems?
Perhaps check the install/update times in /var/log/yum.log .... ? Were they installed in different order (that is, 10.90 after 10.91-1)?
tom
Tom London
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
I think that install 10.90 after 10.91 is not possible, unless particular options. Anyway, fedora-release in /etc reports Fedora release 10.91 (Rawhide)
So what is wrong???