On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:41:38AM -0400, James Laska wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 11:40 -0400, James Laska wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 14:34 +0300, shmuel siegel wrote:
James Laska wrote:
So come join #fedora-qa this Thursday, March 26, 2009 to share your Nouveau graphics test results. A Fedora live image will be available to aid testing. Stay tuned for more details are available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days/2009-03-24.
It seems hard to imagine how filling in the test matrix should need a contributor's agreement (see earlier discussions about triage). If this is a necessary artifact of the wiki, then don't use the wiki. I believe that the set of testers (and hence the hardware reported) would expand if this requirement was dropped.
Thanks for your concerns!
The infrastructure team is investigating enabling an anonymous feedback mechanism for test days. The hope is that this might address some of your concerns around contributor feedback. My concern is that we might not be able to reach out to the anonymous reporter for additional information. But that certainly doesn't negate the proposal.
It pays to read the remainder of the thread first. See the message from Paul Frields (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-March/msg01172.html).
Looks like the new namespace is up and functioning now. You can make new pages with titles like this:
Test_Day:Foo_feature_2008-12-01
The "Test_Day:" namespace should allow public editing. I would advocate moving any future test day pages to the appropriate title in that namespace. Use a similar title to what's shown above, to maximize searchability.
I'd also recommend making a category like [[Category:F11_test_days]] if it doesn't exist already, and putting that link at the bottom each page to attach it to the category.