On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:46 PM Adam Williamson <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
Honestly, I don't really like...any of these. I kinda get the
intent
but they all feel icky, mushy and squishy.
It also feels too vague to me. Even our existing sentence "All Fedora
artwork visible in critical path actions on release-blocking desktops must
be consistent with the proposed final theme." is too vague and I can't
*currently* say what it means exactly. And the proposed changes are even
more vague. They seem to be driven by future-proofing, but I'd rather keep
clearer criteria now and adjust them only when needed. (If I misunderstood
the motivation, please provide a longer explanation). Are there any
existing issues that triggered these proposals?
[1] I envision a world where we could theoretically have the
"Background Logo" GNOME extension display a
"pre-release" notation or
something similar.
So using the same background as the last stable release, but adding a
"pre-release" watermark would be satisfactory for you? I'd find that
utterly confusing. That looks like a criterion downgrade.