Re: dynamic configuration of wired network interfaces looks quite broken

[Antonio Olivares]

--- On Mon, 7/12/10, Michal Jaegermann  wrote:
> From: Michal Jaegermann 
> Subject: Re: dynamic configuration of wired network interfaces looks quite broken
> To: "For testers of Fedora development releases" 
> Date: Monday, July 12, 2010, 1:13 PM
> xuTMoÛ8½óWré�c'è¡ð!hÑÝ`]
> M¤è™–F×GKRQõïû†²�‹½‚,¾y_ÃÇ@*ú<zº¹­èvs³!›is»½y¿Ýl¾>Ðjón³©èÉÕ��

=ÍÁ9Ò%óÖÜÑsÇÔKÊ”?x¦?lhhàØÙ!Q!Ù¿8Ó[⃷Áf'�&}C{¦YÆHþýé+ Ç@»DA2ÕZw#7€¡Èi
> —ÇGN9Q¥§Œù“Ó¯çIâ@.dŽ¶æŠöc>Md‡!Ê�ÍìçÿGòœ@NpX´kc>&Ú-ÒiEÖû×?�™ Lù$ÛãgÜŸ!Ô»¨ü]£‡— rUÇ
> ÓÕ"iêÁÑá�´¤®OŠm!¤70¨–Þ…Ã5Ñǃud‚Äí=÷   
> vä®L{¼¿ÿëII©AEVqFÅ$¨¹£]_À�iqYý«.é%é‡!ûpÀ'šŽi^§´Þ(—%¨%ÙÖi   
> $#¼ÔË[Qc~û@úñ[0ùÎÞWÐ ‚|îd<täò¹   
> (ÅL'«²zóJLßÙf39ıð¤ýŒÓ‰}«Úᛌèât²   
> /‘ÔB¨uÕ-"­©;®�Ü(

¸¤z=�¤Í%EøòøLãÐ H
*P¤õlCv=
;HXÝs#ÑRí”U­-"ÊÎí¹•¨¥º£O:V
> ¥®�iêà{aÌäåPlºtkY’®¬'“V5rÍnÈgQç´/>§2æ[ÀÐ<bË
> `Ÿ]Ö]íǺSº£ÚŒ†%³0½×•+;Ûpª#†b›+ͪ^ö[Æ6^ò’Ë–ŸúY–¤M

Miichal,

Sorry, but I don't understand this.  The message does not appear right.  Which language is it set?

Am I the only one who sees it/saw it this way?

I have gotten many replies of excellent quality, but this one does not appear correctly :(

Thanks and sorry for not understanding your post.

Regards,

Antonio