On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 09:13 +0100, Douglas Furlong wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 19:34 +0200, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:
tir, 19.10.2004 kl. 07.09 skrev Douglas Furlong:
On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 00:30 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:06:33 +0100, Douglas Furlong
<snip>
And a nice link from the vino config section to the system-config- sercuritylevel.
What is wrong with a user level configuration tool, like redhat-config- printer, gdmsetup, or any number of other things, having a link to the system-config-securitylelevel which requires root privileges?
I accepted the "error" in my original statement, but I don't see what the problem is with having the above linking together so that the user see's where he is meant to go to get the system up and running.
Currently we're not powerful enough in for custom ports. So that a user requires specific application knowledge to allow - 5900 say rather than selecting by service.
I'm hoping to fix this after fc3 is out the door. I'd say wait until we have a easier to understand ui for this.
Paul