On Thursday 26 May 2005 04:18, Dan Hollis goemon@anime.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Russell Coker wrote:
The purpose of this list is for people from the community to assist us with testing, and this particularly applies to non-default options. It would be good if you could help us in this regard.
It would be nice if you would stop arguing against people using non-default options then :-)
I am not making a blanket argument against ReiserFS. ReiserFS will work fine for /var/spool/news or /var/spool/mail, also it has never had any SE Linux issues for such use, there's the context= mount option and prior to that people were using ReiserFS on SE Linux systems with genfscon entries in the policy to give all ReiserFS files the desired context. One machine I ran had ReiserFS used for /var/spool/squid and was configured such that all ReiserFS files had the type squid_cache_t.
Also given the fsck issue, it's probably best to mount ReiserFS file systems as nodev,nosuid.