On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:26 AM Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:43 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:41 PM Matthew Miller
> <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:30:07PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Well, you could check based on EVR of fedora-release. Stable release
> > > is always has Release field bumped to 1, and unstable is below 1.
> >
> > True -- as long as people don't get the idea that this means that release
> > candidates are final.
> >
>
> Considering that we just upload a given RC as "Final" if the Go/No-Go
> decision goes in that RC's favor, I think that's fine.
Presumably, this extension is going to need to be revised for the new
logo sometime soon anyway; where should I file a feature request to
have it also include the "prerelease" information?
If the extension can just include some text read from
/usr/lib/os-release, that would be easiest, as we could then just have
it display PRETTY_NAME and set up the fedora-release package to have
PRETTY_NAME be "Fedora 32 (Workstation Edition Pre-release)" until RC
(we change other things at that time anyway, such as disabling the
-testing repos, so we can add this tweak to the process).
FYI:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/pull-request/122