On Tuesday 04 November 2003 15:08, Timothy Murphy wrote:
That didn't seem to be what the poster was saying. He was expressing the view -- which I share -- was that the development may be bad _for RedHat_.
I see no argument in favor of that. RH will concentrate on the features that makes RH Linux a viable solution for enterprises. As an IT manager I'd be happy to have a linux kernel that is tested by millions of linux users and has comercial support.
To me, the RH/Fedora thing is just very confusing, and I don't want to spend a lot of time thinking (or reading) about it.
Sorry, no one can help you with that...
I'm actually running Fedora on one desktop, and RH-9.0 on another, and both are running perfectly. But I knew exactly where I was with RH-6-7-8-9, and I don't feel I know exactly where I am with Fedora.
Changes can be disturbing ... but they are the key for progress.
I just think they may have made a commercial mistake.
I would be happy to hear some arguments.