On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 17:16, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
Would still be interested to hear if you think a change is in order about when rpms are automatically inherited by FC2 development. Don't you think it would be better if it happened at testing time, rather than when moved to stable? Although i do like the notion that we test our rpms _before_ we develop them... That's got to make development easier. ;o)
I don't think this test/stable and development/rawhide system is setup that way. Testing is for making sure the package works before it is moved to production up2date for the current release. Development/rawhide is for working on the next release, which once a package is working fine for the current one, then it's made to work with the new-to-be release, which will probably have lots of different dependencies/mechanisms, like the 2.6 kernel, newer kde, gnome and so on.
LOL, doubt I'm explaining this correctly, hopefully my point is across at least hehe.