On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 04:53 +0100, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
On Die, 2004-10-26 at 00:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
That is an unfortunate error of judgement on their part. Let's not compound it by advocating the fundamentally flawed snake oil which is SPF in an inappropriate forum.
Since you unfortunately decided to prolong the discussion about this subject, what is your problem with SPF?
I agree with Thomas here. If you are going to pronounce such a thorough condemnation of something, and do so with an authoritative tone, you must provide some foundation for your views. Else it's just hot air.
Cheers,