I noted that in the 3.x series of procps, the --format option no longer supports the listing of the cpu in "ps"
Is there another way I can do this without using "top?"
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 01:05:47PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
I noted that in the 3.x series of procps, the --format option no longer supports the listing of the cpu in "ps"
Is there another way I can do this without using "top?"
If nobody else knows a way please file an RFE for this as it is a loss of functionality.
I haven't seen anyone who can provide a work around for this. Nobody in #fedora could see any way around it(some of the folks there were irritated that it had been removed in the first place).
It seems that the "procps" folks http://procps.sourceforge.net would be the folks to ask for assistance. Is this who you would like to see a "RFE"(I can only assume this is an Request for Enhancement) issued to? Or is this a RedHat method of implementing feature requests?
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 13:25, Alan Cox whttp://procps.sourceforge.net/rote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 01:05:47PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
I noted that in the 3.x series of procps, the --format option no longer supports the listing of the cpu in "ps"
Is there another way I can do this without using "top?"
If nobody else knows a way please file an RFE for this as it is a loss of functionality.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 08:45:12AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
It seems that the "procps" folks http://procps.sourceforge.net would be the folks to ask for assistance. Is this who you would like to see a "RFE"(I can only assume this is an Request for Enhancement) issued to? Or is this a RedHat method of implementing feature requests?
Stick a bug in Red Hat bugzilla because its loss of real functionality. You might want to mention it to the procps folks too as they may not be aware the other fork had this feature
I went ahead and bugzilled(now it's a verb?) this issue. I am also going to notify the folks at procps about this and see what they think.
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 14:27, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 08:45:12AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
It seems that the "procps" folks http://procps.sourceforge.net would be the folks to ask for assistance. Is this who you would like to see a "RFE"(I can only assume this is an Request for Enhancement) issued to? Or is this a RedHat method of implementing feature requests?
Stick a bug in Red Hat bugzilla because its loss of real functionality. You might want to mention it to the procps folks too as they may not be aware the other fork had this feature