Update criteria change and proposal

[Adam Williamson]

For those who weren't present at today's blocker review meeting -
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-18/ - we
agreed to change the Alpha criteria to require only console updating to
work, and move the requirement for graphical updating to work to Beta or
later.

I have updated the Alpha criteria already:

https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria...

and I hereby propose the following change for Beta:

https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User:Adamwill/Draft_beta_criteri...

it's pretty straightforward, it just uses the same wording we used to
have at Alpha with obvious tweaks. Upshot is simply that the requirement
for graphical updating to work is moved from Alpha to Beta, as we
basically agreed at the meeting.

The test case page would be updated to link to both criteria.

Comments, suggestions etc welcome, as this is a straightforward change,
if no-one objects I'll put it into production pretty soon. Thanks!

[Tim Flink]

On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:48:33 -0700
Adam Williamson  wrote:
> For those who weren't present at today's blocker review meeting -
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-18/ -
> we agreed to change the Alpha criteria to require only console
> updating to work, and move the requirement for graphical updating to
> work to Beta or later.
>
> I have updated the Alpha criteria already:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria...
>
> and I hereby propose the following change for Beta:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User:Adamwill/Draft_beta_criteri...
>
> it's pretty straightforward, it just uses the same wording we used to
> have at Alpha with obvious tweaks. Upshot is simply that the
> requirement for graphical updating to work is moved from Alpha to
> Beta, as we basically agreed at the meeting.
>
> The test case page would be updated to link to both criteria.
>
> Comments, suggestions etc welcome, as this is a straightforward
> change, if no-one objects I'll put it into production pretty soon.
> Thanks!

Looks good to me.

Tim

[Kamil Paral]

> For those who weren't present at today's blocker review meeting -
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-18/ - we
> agreed to change the Alpha criteria to require only console updating to
> work, and move the requirement for graphical updating to work to Beta or
> later.
>
> I have updated the Alpha criteria already:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria...
>
> and I hereby propose the following change for Beta:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User:Adamwill/Draft_beta_criteri...
>
> it's pretty straightforward, it just uses the same wording we used to
> have at Alpha with obvious tweaks. Upshot is simply that the requirement
> for graphical updating to work is moved from Alpha to Beta, as we
> basically agreed at the meeting.
>
> The test case page would be updated to link to both criteria.
>
> Comments, suggestions etc welcome, as this is a straightforward change,
> if no-one objects I'll put it into production pretty soon. Thanks!

Go ahead, thanks.

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 17:48 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> For those who weren't present at today's blocker review meeting -
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-18/ - we
> agreed to change the Alpha criteria to require only console updating to
> work, and move the requirement for graphical updating to work to Beta or
> later.
>
> I have updated the Alpha criteria already:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria...
>
> and I hereby propose the following change for Beta:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User:Adamwill/Draft_beta_criteri...
>
> it's pretty straightforward, it just uses the same wording we used to
> have at Alpha with obvious tweaks. Upshot is simply that the requirement
> for graphical updating to work is moved from Alpha to Beta, as we
> basically agreed at the meeting.
>
> The test case page would be updated to link to both criteria.
>
> Comments, suggestions etc welcome, as this is a straightforward change,
> if no-one objects I'll put it into production pretty soon. Thanks!

I've gone ahead and put this into production now. Thanks folks!