Hi,
it seems that one of the recent rawhide upgrades broke my IPv6 6in4 tunneling setup. Although the system says that it brought up the sit1 device on boot it does not appear in ifconfig and even ifup sit1 does not help. Anyone else seeing this?
Tom
sit1 Protokoll:IPv6-nach-IPv4 inet6 Adresse: fe80::c0a8:101/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung inet6 Adresse: 2001:xxxx:xxxx:ffff::1d3/127 Gültigkeitsbereich:Global inet6 Adresse: fe80::d536:cc75/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung inet6 Adresse: fe80::c0a8:1/64 Gültigkeitsbereich:Verbindung UP PUNKTZUPUNKT RUNNING NOARP MTU:1472 Metric:1 RX packets:170 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:314 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 Kollisionen:0 Sendewarteschlangenlänge:0 RX bytes:33035 (32.2 KiB) TX bytes:33690 (32.9 KiB)
[root@gate ~]# ping6 www.kame.net PING www.kame.net(orange.kame.net) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from orange.kame.net: icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=486 ms 64 bytes from orange.kame.net: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=541 ms 64 bytes from orange.kame.net: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=435 ms
[root@xxx ~]# ping6 www.kame.net PING www.kame.net(orange.kame.net) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from orange.kame.net: icmp_seq=0 ttl=56 time=505 ms 64 bytes from orange.kame.net: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=464 ms 64 bytes from orange.kame.net: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=486 ms
works fine here.
/ds
Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
Hi,
it seems that one of the recent rawhide upgrades broke my IPv6 6in4 tunneling setup. Although the system says that it brought up the sit1 device on boot it does not appear in ifconfig and even ifup sit1 does not help. Anyone else seeing this?
Tom
Hi,
after some lengthy debugging session :-( I have found that it was not a rawhide update but system-config-network which has caused my IPv6 tunnel to fail. Just starting this application and changing the configuration of my eth0 device caused a line reading "TYPE=Ethernet" to be added to my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-sit1 which in turn caused ifup to call ifup-eth instead of ifup-sit. I have created a bugzilla tracker for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137898
Tom