Kernel 2.6.13-1.1532_FC5 fails to boot on my AMD 2000+.
The system tries to change to runlevel 5 and then gets the complaint ID 1 respawn too fast ID 2 respawn too fast : ID 6 respawn too fast No more processes to spawn
and then hangs at that level. Version 1530 does not have this issue.
Glenn
glenn wrote:
Kernel 2.6.13-1.1532_FC5 fails to boot on my AMD 2000+.
The system tries to change to runlevel 5 and then gets the complaint ID 1 respawn too fast ID 2 respawn too fast : ID 6 respawn too fast No more processes to spawn
and then hangs at that level. Version 1530 does not have this issue.
Glenn
Same here.. Using SMP kernel.
Works here with the 64b version...
Le Samedi 3 Septembre 2005 22:37, glenn a écrit :
Kernel 2.6.13-1.1532_FC5 fails to boot on my AMD 2000+.
The system tries to change to runlevel 5 and then gets the complaint ID 1 respawn too fast ID 2 respawn too fast
ID 6 respawn too fast No more processes to spawn
and then hangs at that level. Version 1530 does not have this issue.
Glenn
___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 16:37:29 -0400, glenn gsimpson@mountaincable.net wrote:
Kernel 2.6.13-1.1532_FC5 fails to boot on my AMD 2000+.
The system tries to change to runlevel 5 and then gets the complaint ID 1 respawn too fast ID 2 respawn too fast : ID 6 respawn too fast No more processes to spawn
and then hangs at that level. Version 1530 does not have this issue.
'Same problem here. 'Running an old PIII smp.
Bob J
Bob Jones wrote:
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 16:37:29 -0400, glenn gsimpson@mountaincable.net wrote:
Kernel 2.6.13-1.1532_FC5 fails to boot on my AMD 2000+.
The system tries to change to runlevel 5 and then gets the complaint ID 1 respawn too fast ID 2 respawn too fast : ID 6 respawn too fast No more processes to spawn
and then hangs at that level. Version 1530 does not have this issue.
'Same problem here. 'Running an old PIII smp.
Bob J
Athlon running i686 fails with the same symptom. Kernel 1530 boots w/o a halt.
Jim
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:42:13AM -0400, Jim Cornette wrote:
Bob Jones wrote:
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 16:37:29 -0400, glenn gsimpson@mountaincable.net wrote:
Kernel 2.6.13-1.1532_FC5 fails to boot on my AMD 2000+.
The system tries to change to runlevel 5 and then gets the complaint ID 1 respawn too fast
...
'Same problem here. 'Running an old PIII smp.
...
Athlon running i686 fails with the same symptom. Kernel 1530 boots w/o a halt.
Bugzilla reports? I do not see any. Or this is a bugzilla search messing up once again?
x86_64 version of this kernel seems to be fine for a change.
Michal
On 9/4/05, Michal Jaegermann michal@harddata.com wrote:
Bugzilla reports? I do not see any. Or this is a bugzilla search messing up once again?
x86_64 version of this kernel seems to be fine for a change.
sort of moot now.. today's kernel 1535 seems to have corrected whatever issue there was, atleast on my system.
-jef
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:42:13AM -0400, Jim Cornette wrote:
Bob Jones wrote:
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 16:37:29 -0400, glenn gsimpson@mountaincable.net wrote:
Kernel 2.6.13-1.1532_FC5 fails to boot on my AMD 2000+.
The system tries to change to runlevel 5 and then gets the complaint ID 1 respawn too fast
...
'Same problem here. 'Running an old PIII smp.
...
Athlon running i686 fails with the same symptom. Kernel 1530 boots w/o a halt.
Bugzilla reports? I do not see any. Or this is a bugzilla search messing up once again?
x86_64 version of this kernel seems to be fine for a change.
Michal
Bugzilla contained a lot of bug reports for development that relate to the kernel. Maybe bugzilla should be segregated to show latest released versions for development versions. (Masking zapped earlier released and no longer in the development repository) I searched for 1532 but did not find an entry either. Adding another bug report for the frequent development kernel releases would have added just more open bugs against the kernel (development). kernel-2.6.13-1.1535_FC5 boots decent and seems to be working as expected.
Jim
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 11:35:25PM -0400, Jim Cornette wrote:
Bugzilla contained a lot of bug reports for development that relate to the kernel.
That is indeed the case. OTOH it is possible to limit a search to bugs which were reported in the last n days. Maybe this is under "Advanced"; I do not remember. This works particularly well with development packages as they tend to change rather quickly.
I searched for 1532 but did not find an entry either.
I tried that too before asking on this mailing list. I have seen situations when I _knew_ that a report is there but bugzilla was still responding with "Zarro bugs found". Often searching works but sometimes it appears that bugzilla is using different criteria than what would look "natural".
Michal
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 11:35:25PM -0400, Jim Cornette wrote:
Bugzilla contained a lot of bug reports for development that relate to the kernel.
That is indeed the case. OTOH it is possible to limit a search to bugs which were reported in the last n days. Maybe this is under "Advanced"; I do not remember. This works particularly well with development packages as they tend to change rather quickly.
I searched for 1532 but did not find an entry either.
I tried that too before asking on this mailing list. I have seen situations when I _knew_ that a report is there but bugzilla was still responding with "Zarro bugs found". Often searching works but sometimes it appears that bugzilla is using different criteria than what would look "natural".
Michal
kernel-2.6.13-1.1536_FC5 does a similar stoppage while booting as 1532 does. I filed a bug against the kernel for this round.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167585
Jim
-
Bob Jones -
David Woodhouse -
Dwaine Garden -
glenn -
Jef Spaleta -
Jim Cornette -
Michal Jaegermann -
Sylvain Rouillard