I note that there are 5 requests current in FAS to join the proventester group, but without any corresponding QA Trac ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/
The rules for entry require a ticket in the latter to start the process (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester for the current procedures)
I guess that no action will be taken on the list of 5 requests unless the requestors file a ticket with QA Trac first!
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:37:25 +0000 mike cloaked mike.cloaked@gmail.com wrote:
I note that there are 5 requests current in FAS to join the proventester group, but without any corresponding QA Trac ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/
The rules for entry require a ticket in the latter to start the process (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester for the current procedures)
I guess that no action will be taken on the list of 5 requests unless the requestors file a ticket with QA Trac first!
Yeah. I'd like to suggest:
- Make the group 'invite only'. - Add to the description/requirements on the group a pointer to the process and tell people to see that link. - When sponsors sponsor someone into the group, they just add them, then sponsor them.
This would prevent people from falling through the cracks like above.
kevin
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:34 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:37:25 +0000 mike cloaked mike.cloaked@gmail.com wrote:
I note that there are 5 requests current in FAS to join the proventester group, but without any corresponding QA Trac ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/
The rules for entry require a ticket in the latter to start the process (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester for the current procedures)
I guess that no action will be taken on the list of 5 requests unless the requestors file a ticket with QA Trac first!
Yeah. I'd like to suggest:
- Make the group 'invite only'.
- Add to the description/requirements on the group a pointer to the process and tell people to see that link.
- When sponsors sponsor someone into the group, they just add them, then sponsor them.
This would prevent people from falling through the cracks like above.
Good idea, I was wondering how we could avoid people slipping through the cracks. I'll add this to our Monday meeting agenda. If no other objections by then ... we'll fix the glitch.
Thanks! James