We had a ticket come up in the blocker meeting today, where I got the feeling that people felt that any major breakage that was language dependent should be a blocker. We sort of fudged this into a blocker using a different criterion, but I think if that is the intent we should note that being able to use English as a work around isn't good enough. I don't know if we'd want to require all languages to work like in the final criterion, but it did seem that multiple languages not working for installation was considered to be a blocker issue for alpha.
On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 11:20 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
We had a ticket come up in the blocker meeting today, where I got the feeling that people felt that any major breakage that was language dependent should be a blocker. We sort of fudged this into a blocker using a different criterion, but I think if that is the intent we should note that being able to use English as a work around isn't good enough. I don't know if we'd want to require all languages to work like in the final criterion, but it did seem that multiple languages not working for installation was considered to be a blocker issue for alpha.
Sure, it might be an idea to draft an Alpha criterion based on the Final one in that case...
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 10:32:16 -0800, Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Sure, it might be an idea to draft an Alpha criterion based on the Final one in that case...
I'll do that.
-
Adam Williamson -
Bruno Wolff III