Fedora-Xfce-armhfp-21-20140803-sda.raw.xz - yum install did not automagically ask to download the signing key

[Robert Moskowitz]

OK.  I am spoiled; I am use to just doing a yum install after a build 
and it automagically asks if I want to download the key.  Not this time:

yum install tigervnc-server policycoreutils-python

.....

Total                                              261 kB/s |  13 MB  00:50

Package setools-libs-3.3.8-4.fc21.armv7hl.rpm is not signed

=====================

So now I have to look up the command to download the signing key. But 
this is not the behaviour with yum that I am use to.  And last week's 
build did prompt me.

Misread message, but still - Re: Fedora-Xfce-armhfp-21-20140803-sda.raw.xz - yum install did not automagically ask to download the signing key

[Robert Moskowitz]

On 08/04/2014 11:39 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> OK. I am spoiled; I am use to just doing a yum install after a build 
> and it automagically asks if I want to download the key.  Not this time:
>
> yum install tigervnc-server policycoreutils-python
>
> .....
>
> Total                                              261 kB/s |  13 MB  
> 00:50
>
> Package setools-libs-3.3.8-4.fc21.armv7hl.rpm is not signed
>
> =====================
>
> So now I have to look up the command to download the signing key. But 
> this is not the behaviour with yum that I am use to.  And last week's 
> build did prompt me.

Maybe I should read the message better.  The package is not signed, not 
that the key is not present.  Oh.  This is still blocking the install 
unless gpgcheck is set to zero.  Which I did to get past this point.

I just did a 'yum update' (appearantly some updates already from the 8/3 
build) and got:

Package system-config-printer-udev-1.5.0-6.fc21.armv7hl.rpm is not signed

So I am guessing that at this time in the development work, this should 
be expected so run with gpg check off.

Misread message, but still - Re: Fedora-Xfce-armhfp-21-20140803-sda.raw.xz - yum install did not automagically ask to download the signing key

[Michael Cronenworth]

On 08/04/2014 12:56 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Maybe I should read the message better.  The package is not signed, not that the
> key is not present.  Oh.  This is still blocking the install unless gpgcheck is
> set to zero.  Which I did to get past this point.
>
> I just did a 'yum update' (appearantly some updates already from the 8/3 build)
> and got:
>
> Package system-config-printer-udev-1.5.0-6.fc21.armv7hl.rpm is not signed

Fedora 21 packages are not being sent through Bodhi yet. Packages are not 
guaranteed to be signed.

You can pass "--nogpgcheck" to yum as an alternative to changing your repo file.
> So I am guessing that at this time in the development work, this should be
> expected so run with gpg check off.

Yes.