Hey All,
We are closing in on the Go/NoGo tonight and We would like to have as much feedback as possible on this new 1.5 RC. Also, there is a potential nvme bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186358, people with nvme storage devices with free cycles, we do appreciate you testing this out!
Also, Fedora Media Writer hasn't been tested on Mac and Windows 11, so if you have any of those, it would be great to have some testing on those as well!
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: rawhide@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:40 AM Subject: [Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Candidate RC-1.5 Available Now! To: test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate RC-1.5 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/38
You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_38_RC_1.5_Summary
The individual test result pages are:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_38_RC_1.5_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_38_RC_1.5_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_38_RC_1.5_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_38_RC_1.5_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_38_RC_1.5_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_38_RC_1.5_Security_Lab
All RC priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the RC Release Criteria [3].
Help is available on #fedora-qa on libera.chat [4], or on the test list [5].
Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
[1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_RC_Release_Criteria [4] https://web.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-qa [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/ _______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproj... Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 11:48 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
Hey All,
We are closing in on the Go/NoGo tonight and We would like to have as much feedback as possible on this new 1.5 RC. Also, there is a potential nvme bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186358, people with nvme storage devices with free cycles, we do appreciate you testing this out!
Also, Fedora Media Writer hasn't been tested on Mac and Windows 11, so if you have any of those, it would be great to have some testing on those as well!
So, for a bit more back story: the only difference between 1.4 and 1.5 is (should be, anyway) that the lives and Server DVD of 1.5 include nvme-cli. Otherwise there shouldn't be any difference.
We did 1.5 to give us another option to deal with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186358 at the go/no-go in the morning. Unfortunately it seems a lot of images failed in the 1.5 build because of some kind of network issue - we're missing several lives, and the x86_64 Silverblue installer image. We probably can't really ship 1.5.
So, our options will be to ship 1.4 (i.e. reject or waive the nvme bug as a blocker), ship some kind of hybrid of 1.4 and 1.5 (i.e. most of 1.4, but the Server DVD from 1.5, probably), or slip. We'll figure this out at the meeting tomorrow.
All testing of 1.4 and 1.5 is useful; for 1.5 probably focus on smoke tests of the Server images, and also confirming that it actually fixes 2186358 . For 1.4, if folks can fill out any remaining gaps in the matrices that'd be great.
Thanks everyone!
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 23:53:41 -0700 Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 11:48 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
Hey All,
We are closing in on the Go/NoGo tonight and We would like to have as much feedback as possible on this new 1.5 RC. Also, there is a potential nvme bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186358, people with nvme storage devices with free cycles, we do appreciate you testing this out!
Also, Fedora Media Writer hasn't been tested on Mac and Windows 11, so if you have any of those, it would be great to have some testing on those as well!
So, for a bit more back story: the only difference between 1.4 and 1.5 is (should be, anyway) that the lives and Server DVD of 1.5 include nvme-cli. Otherwise there shouldn't be any difference.
We did 1.5 to give us another option to deal with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186358 at the go/no-go in the morning. Unfortunately it seems a lot of images failed in the 1.5 build because of some kind of network issue - we're missing several lives, and the x86_64 Silverblue installer image. We probably can't really ship 1.5.
So, our options will be to ship 1.4 (i.e. reject or waive the nvme bug as a blocker), ship some kind of hybrid of 1.4 and 1.5 (i.e. most of 1.4, but the Server DVD from 1.5, probably), or slip. We'll figure this out at the meeting tomorrow.
FWIW from the alt-arch point of view the RC 1.5 is better (aka more complete) than RC 1.4, which is mainly lacking the s390x cloud images.
Dan
All testing of 1.4 and 1.5 is useful; for 1.5 probably focus on smoke tests of the Server images, and also confirming that it actually fixes 2186358 . For 1.4, if folks can fill out any remaining gaps in the matrices that'd be great.
Thanks everyone!
Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 09:41 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
FWIW from the alt-arch point of view the RC 1.5 is better (aka more complete) than RC 1.4, which is mainly lacking the s390x cloud images.
Well, I'm not really sure. We track missing images. This is RC-1.4:
https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/4851
This is RC-1.5:
https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/4855
1.5 is definitely missing a *lot* more stuff.
-
Adam Williamson -
Dan Horák -
Sumantro Mukherjee