Greetings.
My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched.
I know I've been successful in the past with these types of upgrades, but I don't recall how I did it, and Googling hasn't given me the answer.
TIA
Scott
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800):
My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched.
My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right away and fixed the repo configs with dnf config-manager IIRC followed by simply dnf upgrade --releasever=38 --skip-broken. There was one new package that makes kernel locking more complicated.
# pinxi -Saz --zl --hostname System: Host: big41 Kernel: 6.1.10-200.fc37.x86_64 arch: x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 2.38-25.fc37 parameters: ro root=LABEL=<filter> ipv6.disable=1 net.ifnames=0 mitigations=auto consoleblank=0 Desktop: KDE Plasma v: 5.26.90 tk: Qt v: 5.15.8 wm: kwin_x11 vt: 7 dm: 1: KDM 2: XDM Distro: Fedora release 38 (Rawhide)
On 2/12/2023 10:24 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800):
My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched.
My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right away and fixed the repo configs with dnf config-manager IIRC followed by simply dnf upgrade --releasever=38 --skip-broken. There was one new package that makes kernel locking more complicated.
Can you elaborate on what you did?
Thanks.
Scott
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 15:09 (UTC-0800):
Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800):
My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched.
My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right away and fixed the repo configs with dnf config-manager IIRC followed by simply dnf upgrade --releasever=38 --skip-broken. There was one new package that makes kernel locking more complicated.
Can you elaborate on what you did?
Not with any more detail than contained in the relevant period in .bash_history. A *lot* has transpired in the mean time.
dnf clean all #1676142230 dfh / #1676142333 dnfpre.sh38 #1676142492 dfh / #1676142521 time dnf system-upgrade --releasever=38 --skip-broken #1676142531 time dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=38 --skip-broken #1676142723 time dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=38 --skip-broken --best #1676142788 dnf upgrade plasma-workspace plasma-workspace-common #1676142801 dnf upgrade --releasever=38 plasma-workspace plasma-workspace-common #1676143115 dfh #1676143128 dnf clean packages #1676143131 dfh / #1676143184 time dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=38 --skip-broken --best #1676143420 rpm -e --nodeps geoclue2 xdg-desktop-portal #1676143443 time dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=38 --skip-broken --best #1676144651 dfh #1676144672 dnf system-upgrade reboot #1676145175 journalctl -b -1 #1676145224 time dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=38 --skip-broken --best #1676145333 dnf system-upgrade reboot #1676145815 rpmqa fc37 | wc -l #1676145823 rpmqa fc38 | wc -l #1676145834 lr /boot #1676145894 rpmqa fc39 | wc -l #1676145909 dnf repolist enabled #1676145926 dnf config-manager --set-disabled rawhide #1676145949 dnf config-manager --set-enabled fedora updates updates-testing #1676145958 dnf repolist all #1676145975 rpmqa fedora #1676146046 dnf install --releasever=38 fedora-release fedora-release-common fedora-release-identity-basic fedora-repos fedora-gpg-keys #1676146075 dnf downgrade --releasever=38 fedora-release fedora-release-common fedora-release-identity-basic fedora-repos fedora-gpg-keys #1676146091 dnf repolist all #1676146103 rpmqa fc39 #1676146297 dnf clean all #1676146303 dnf makecache #1676146574 time dnf upgrade #1676146608 time dnf upgrade --releasever=38 #1676146959 rpmqa fc38 #1676146964 rpmqa fc39 #1676146968 rpmqa fc37 #1676147014 rpmqa odem #1676147028 rpm -e ModemManager-glib #1676147036 rpm -e ModemManager-glib geoclue2 #1676147045 rpm -e ModemManager-glib geoclue2 xdg-desktop-portal #1676147057 rpm -e ModemManager-glib geoclue2 xdg-desktop-portal xdg-desktop-portal-gtk #1676147200 Reboot #1676145815 rpmqa fc37 | wc -l #1676145823 rpmqa fc38 | wc -l #1676145834 lr /boot #1676145894 rpmqa fc39 | wc -l #1676145909 dnf repolist enabled #1676145926 dnf config-manager --set-disabled rawhide #1676145949 dnf config-manager --set-enabled fedora updates updates-testing #1676145958 dnf repolist all #1676145975 rpmqa fedora #1676146046 dnf install --releasever=38 fedora-release fedora-release-common fedora-release-identity-basic fedora-repos fedora-gpg-keys #1676146075 dnf downgrade --releasever=38 fedora-release fedora-release-common fedora-release-identity-basic fedora-repos fedora-gpg-keys #1676146091 dnf repolist all #1676146103 rpmqa fc39 #1676146297 dnf clean all #1676146303 dnf makecache #1676146574 time dnf upgrade #1676146608 time dnf upgrade --releasever=38 #1676146959 rpmqa fc38 #1676146964 rpmqa fc39 #1676146968 rpmqa fc37 #
# cat /usr/local/bin/dnfpre.sh38 #!/bin/bash time dnf upgrade --releasever=38 dnf* rpm* libsol* glib* systemd* fedor* dracu* hawk* # alias | grep rpm alias rpmqa='rpm -qa | sort | grep $*' alias rpmqf='rpm -qf ' # alias | grep df alias df='df --exclude-type=tmpfs --exclude-type=devtmpfs --exclude-type=cgroup ' alias dfh='df -h '
On 2/12/23 4:50 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 15:09 (UTC-0800):
Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 09:22 (UTC-0800):
My attempts to upgrade landed me in Rawhide instead of Branched.
My last one, on a Core2Duo, did too, but I caught it right away and fixed the repo configs with dnf config-manager IIRC followed by simply dnf upgrade --releasever=38 --skip-broken. There was one new package that makes kernel locking more complicated.
Can you elaborate on what you did?
Not with any more detail than contained in the relevant period in .bash_history. A *lot* has transpired in the mean time.
[snip]
Thanks,
I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the repos are still pointing to rawhide.
I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production machine, anyway.
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 18:11 (UTC-0800):
I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the repos are still pointing to rawhide.
I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production machine, anyway.
I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6 fedora* packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now I've simply added fedora-re*39* to exclude= in dnf.conf.
# dnf repolist enabled repo id repo name fedora Fedora rawhide - x86_64 fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora rawhide openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 updates Fedora rawhide - x86_64 - Updates updates-testing Fedora rawhide - x86_64 - Test Updates # rpmqa fedora-re error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 4 Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 8898875c: BAD Header SHA1 digest: OK fedora-release-38-0.23.noarch fedora-release-common-38-0.23.noarch fedora-release-identity-basic-38-0.23.noarch fedora-repos-38-0.4.noarch fedora-repos-rawhide-38-0.4.noarch # grep RETT /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="Fedora Linux 38 (Rawhide Prerelease)" #
On 2/13/23 1:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 18:11 (UTC-0800):
I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the repos are still pointing to rawhide. I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production machine, anyway.
I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6 fedora* packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now I've simply added fedora-re*39* to exclude= in dnf.conf.
Yeah, sounds like we've got a bug.
On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 08:29 -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
On 2/13/23 1:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 18:11 (UTC-0800):
I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the repos are still pointing to rawhide. I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production machine, anyway.
I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6 fedora* packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now I've simply added fedora-re*39* to exclude= in dnf.conf.
Yeah, sounds like we've got a bug.
Well, it's not so much a bug as we haven't been able to do a second Branched compose. The first one didn't get the updated fedora-release and fedora-repos; the second one should, but we haven't been able to do a compose for days because of the s390x outage holding up builds that we needed to get a compose done.
We should hopefully be able to get a compose through by end of today. In the meantime you can just update to the latest fedora-release and fedora-repos packages from Koji if you like.
On 2/13/2023 3:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2023-02-13 at 08:29 -0800, Scott Beamer wrote:
On 2/13/23 1:30 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
Scott Beamer composed on 2023-02-12 18:11 (UTC-0800):
I just now did a fresh install of the latest branched version, and the repos are still pointing to rawhide. I'm gonna let it go for now. None of this is on a production machine, anyway.
I just did a system-upgrade to 38 branch on another PC. When it was all over, I tried dnf makecache followed by dnf upgrade. The proposal was to upgrade 6 fedora* packages to 39-0.1 versions. For now I've simply added fedora-re*39* to exclude= in dnf.conf.
Yeah, sounds like we've got a bug.
Well, it's not so much a bug as we haven't been able to do a second Branched compose. The first one didn't get the updated fedora-release and fedora-repos; the second one should, but we haven't been able to do a compose for days because of the s390x outage holding up builds that we needed to get a compose done.
We should hopefully be able to get a compose through by end of today. In the meantime you can just update to the latest fedora-release and fedora-repos packages from Koji if you like.
Yep. It's all good now. Thanks.
-
Adam Williamson -
Felix Miata -
Scott Beamer