# F20 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #3 # Date: 2013-09-04 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's time for the first F20 blocker review meeting post-alpha-freeze! We've been seeing great participation so far in F20 and would love to see that continue.
We'll be running through the final blockers and freeze exception bugs. The current list is available at: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
We'll be reviewing the bugs to determine ...
1. Whether they meet the alpha release criteria [1] and should stay on the list 2. Whether they are getting the attention they need
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria
For guidance on Blocker and FreezeException bugs, please refer to - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process
For the blocker review meeting protocol, see -https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
_______________________________________________ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
================================================= #fedora-blocker-review: f20alpha-blocker-review-3 =================================================
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-04/f20alpha-b... Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-04/f20alpha-b... Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-04/f20alpha-b...
Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (tflink, 16:01:32)
* Introduction (tflink, 16:08:32) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze exception bugs. (tflink, 16:08:44) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:08:51) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 16:08:51) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:08:58) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 16:08:59) * Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:09:05) * 8 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:09:12) * 5 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:09:12) * 0 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:09:12) * 3 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:09:12)
* (1000703) TypeError: not enough arguments for format string (tflink, 16:10:10) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000703 (tflink, 16:10:13) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 16:10:15) * AGREED: 1000703 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This doesn't violate any F20 alpha release critera and thus does not qualify as a release blocking bug. However, a tested fix would be considered past freeze. (tflink, 16:18:22)
* (1002811) Anaconda is unable to handle dependcy problems without crashing (tflink, 16:18:34) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002811 (tflink, 16:18:37) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:18:40) * AGREED: 1002811 - RejectedBlocker RejectedFreezeException - This doesn't violate any F20 alpha release criterion and is a request for anaconda behavior change and thus doesn't qualify as a release blocking bug for F20 alpha. (tflink, 16:30:46)
* (1003229) TC2 Net installer fails with Error 256 (tflink, 16:31:39) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003229 (tflink, 16:31:40) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:31:40) * AGREED: 1003229 - RejectedBlocker - This appears to be a mirror issue and does not violate any F20 alpha release criteria, thus rejected as a release blocking bug for f20 alpha. (tflink, 16:38:34)
* (994180) Boot-time LUKS passphrase input *always* defaults to en-us (tflink, 16:38:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994180 (tflink, 16:38:45) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:38:48) * AGREED: 994180 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for systems with a non-us keyboard and encrypted disks: "A working mechanism to create a user account must be clearly presented during installation and/or first boot of the installed system." (tflink, 16:50:20)
* (1004323) Apper: "You have failed to provide correct authentication." while checking/installing updates (tflink, 16:50:34) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004323 (tflink, 16:50:38) * Proposed Blocker, apper, NEW (tflink, 16:50:40) * AGREED: 1004323 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for KDE: "The installed system must be able to download and install updates with yum and with the default graphical package manager in all release-blocking desktops." (tflink, 16:53:40)
* (1003691) firefox pretrans scriptlet issues (tflink, 16:53:45) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003691 (tflink, 16:53:46) * Proposed Blocker, firefox, ON_QA (tflink, 16:53:46) * AGREED: 1003691 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for firefox, which is part of the default gnome install: "There must be no errors in any package on the release-blocking images which cause the package to fail to install." (tflink, 16:55:48)
* (1002737) initial-setup-graphical.service does not run - TypeError: Argument 1 does not allow None as a value (tflink, 16:56:04) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002737 (tflink, 16:56:07) * Proposed Blocker, initial-setup, NEW (tflink, 16:56:09) * AGREED: 1002737 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for ARM images with a graphical desktop: "A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility." (tflink, 16:58:52)
* (985569) libuser wrongly sets "date of last password change" shadow field to 0 on systems without an rtc (tflink, 16:59:07) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985569 (tflink, 16:59:10) * Proposed Blocker, libuser, ASSIGNED (tflink, 16:59:13) * AGREED: 985569 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This doesn't violate any of the F20 alpha release criteria and thus is rejected as a release blocking bug for alpha. However, a tested fix would be considered past freeze. (tflink, 17:03:44)
* (1004421) f20 SoaS TC3 uses gdm which defaults to gnome. Autologon starts gnome with no chance to choose sugar-desktop (tflink, 17:06:56) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004421 (tflink, 17:06:59) * Proposed Freeze Exception, sugar, NEW (tflink, 17:07:02) * AGREED: 1004421 - AcceptedFreezeException - This prevents SoaS from booting properly and would be a blocker for a release blocking DE, therefore accepted as a FE for F20 alpha. (tflink, 17:09:44)
* Accepted blockers (kparal, 17:11:52) * 1000715, 1001081 are waiting on TC3 (tflink, 17:12:03) * 1002055 is waiting on gnome update (tflink, 17:12:14) * 1000889 has a patch, should be in next anaconda build (tflink, 17:12:26) * AGREED: no more review of accepted blockers is needed today, all seem to be progressing well (tflink, 17:15:16)
* Open Floor (tflink, 17:15:22) * F20 Alpha TC3 should be landing shortly, will need testing (tflink, 17:18:15) * next blocker review meeting will be 2013-09-11 @ 16:00 UTC unless another meeting is needed on 2013-09-09 (tflink, 17:18:56)
Meeting ended at 17:21:46 UTC.
Action Items ------------
Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none)
People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * tflink (174) * kparal (69) * Viking-Ice (59) * jreznik (19) * pwhalen (13) * Martix (12) * handsome_pirate (7) * kalev (5) * pschindl (5) * zodbot (4) * spstarr_work (3) * satellit_e (3) * dgilmore (2)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot