Evolution 2.0.4, a bugfix release, has been released:
http://codeblogs.ximian.com/blogs/evolution/archives/000449.html
Will we get this for FC3? (We didn't get 2.0.3.)
Best, Darren
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 14:57 +0000, D. D. Brierton wrote:
Evolution 2.0.4, a bugfix release, has been released:
http://codeblogs.ximian.com/blogs/evolution/archives/000449.html
Will we get this for FC3? (We didn't get 2.0.3.)
Put an update request in Bugzilla.
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 10:12 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
Evolution 2.0.4, a bugfix release, has been released:
http://codeblogs.ximian.com/blogs/evolution/archives/000449.html
Will we get this for FC3? (We didn't get 2.0.3.)
Put an update request in Bugzilla.
I hear this is on dmalcolm's plate for the day - 2.0.4 that is. So hang in there, I guess
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 05:19 +0800, Colin Charles wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 10:12 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
Evolution 2.0.4, a bugfix release, has been released:
http://codeblogs.ximian.com/blogs/evolution/archives/000449.html
Will we get this for FC3? (We didn't get 2.0.3.)
Put an update request in Bugzilla.
I hear this is on dmalcolm's plate for the day - 2.0.4 that is. So hang in there, I guess
I just did these, as Test updates (see the flurry of emails that just hit this list) - please download and try them out.
There are dependencies between the packages, so you should grab all 5 of the updates if you're going to do this.
Dave
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 00:47 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 05:19 +0800, Colin Charles wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 10:12 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
Evolution 2.0.4, a bugfix release, has been released:
http://codeblogs.ximian.com/blogs/evolution/archives/000449.html
Will we get this for FC3? (We didn't get 2.0.3.)
Put an update request in Bugzilla.
I hear this is on dmalcolm's plate for the day - 2.0.4 that is. So hang in there, I guess
I just did these, as Test updates (see the flurry of emails that just hit this list) - please download and try them out.
There are dependencies between the packages, so you should grab all 5 of the updates if you're going to do this.
To give you some feedback: I am running the 2.0.4 packages on my laptop, looks to be working well!
Thanks,
Keith.
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 09:59 +0000, Keith Sharp wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 00:47 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 05:19 +0800, Colin Charles wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 10:12 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
Evolution 2.0.4, a bugfix release, has been released:
http://codeblogs.ximian.com/blogs/evolution/archives/000449.html
Will we get this for FC3? (We didn't get 2.0.3.)
Put an update request in Bugzilla.
I hear this is on dmalcolm's plate for the day - 2.0.4 that is. So hang in there, I guess
I just did these, as Test updates (see the flurry of emails that just hit this list) - please download and try them out.
There are dependencies between the packages, so you should grab all 5 of the updates if you're going to do this.
To give you some feedback: I am running the 2.0.4 packages on my laptop, looks to be working well!
Thanks for the feedback - good to hear.
Dave
Hi - thankf for setting this up - my feedback:
1) calendar is much faster 2) imap loads faster 3) mem leak - not sure yet will monitor and report back right now I'm focusing on (4):
**4) 98% CPU stuck on htt_server - is this related or something else? seems to come with iiimf-server but cannot think what uses that? Only other things running were 2 shell windows, a firefox and 1 copy of crossover running quicken.
gene/
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:45:10PM -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
**4) 98% CPU stuck on htt_server - is this related or something else?
1) killing evo - rebooting machine and restarting evo - after 12 hours the runaway htt_server has not yet returned.
2) Initial memory usage was 170 MiB ... 12 hours later it is 202 MiB. This is definitely way better than before where it took about a week to reach 1 GiB - (as a ref point evo 1.4 would only last 1 day before it had to be killed - so we have progressed to 3 days for evo 2.0.2. and 2.0.4 is definitely improved from there.
I cannot explain why an idle evo would grow 30 MiB in 12 hours - yes a small number of messages arrived at the imap store but still.
Its a little early to say but so far the memory leak is defintely better - I cannot say it is all gone.
I will monitor this over the next 48 hours and see how it fares and report back.
regards,
gene/
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 08:39:59AM -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:45:10PM -0500, Mail Lists wrote: defintely better - I cannot say it is all gone.
I will monitor this over the next 48 hours and see how it fares and report back.
Some prelim results - there are definitely memory leaks remaining - not just small ones.
Clicking on the button to send a new mail - immediately grows memory - it is never returned. Curiously - it grows by either 1 MiB + 1KiB or just 1 KiB.
Clicking on calendar view sometimes grows memory a small amount and then alternating mail/cal has no further effect.
No memory is ever freed/returned.
So far - over the last hour or so the memory has grown 6 MiB - basically reading via imap (no leak?) and sending a 1/2 dozen or small messages. Log is day, hh:mm-s vsize, rss
01-08:32-49 : evolution 202004 62296 01-09:32-50 : evolution 208084 68480
At the current rate - sending 5 to 10 messages an hour will grow memory by just under 100 MiB per 12 hour day. Means killing evolution every few days or so ;-(
Although better than earlier version we do still have a memory leak problem.
Additionaly, evolution-data-server started out at 170 MiB (which seems high but ...) and also behaves very oddly. Nothing is happening but email and view calendar and back to email. This one has jumped nearly 100 MiB !!!
01-08:42-01 : evolution-data- 169912 13440 01-09:32-02 : evolution-data- 262108 13512
Summary - sending mail leaks mem in evolution process - seems to be 2 sources - 1 MiB and 1 KiB - both visible simply pressing the new mail button.
i Will keep monitoring.
gene/
regards,
gene/
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:54:57AM -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 08:39:59AM -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
I will monitor this over the next 48 hours and see how it fares and report back.
01-08:42-01 : evolution-data- 169912 13440 01-09:32-02 : evolution-data- 262108 13512
evolution-data-server - seems to be leaking worse than evo itself.
This one is growing and no human hand is touching the machine - very odd. evo is running and presumably monitoring the single imap mail account.
01-09:42-02 : evolution-data- 282596 13524
Yikes! 20 Mb for no reason at all!!
gene/
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:54:57AM -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
I will monitor this over the next 48 hours and see how it fares and report back.
evo itslef - just running with a single imap account and no human activity continues to grow - I would imagine it shouldn't be growing by more than a few KiB per message but ...
01-08:32-49 : evolution 202004 62296 01-09:32-50 : evolution 208084 68480
01-10:22-50 : evolution 208212 69152 01-10:32-50 : evolution 209364 69412
Between evo and data server they have sucked up 80 MiB in RSS and 300 MiB in vsize in under 2 hours of very light activity.
gene
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:41:26 -0500, Mail Lists lists@sapience.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:54:57AM -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
I will monitor this over the next 48 hours and see how it fares and report back.
evo itslef - just running with a single imap account and no human activity continues to grow - I would imagine it shouldn't be growing by more than a few KiB per message but ...
01-08:32-49 : evolution 202004 62296 01-09:32-50 : evolution 208084 68480
01-10:22-50 : evolution 208212 69152 01-10:32-50 : evolution 209364 69412 Between evo and data server they have sucked up 80 MiB in RSS and 300 MiB in vsize in under 2 hours of very light activity.
gene
Hi Gene;
I'm just watching this thread out of curiosity, but I'm not running evo test yet. I'm wondering what happens if you turn off IMAP auto checking, assuming you have it on.
-P
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 10:41 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
Between evo and data server they have sucked up 80 MiB in RSS and 300 MiB in vsize in under 2 hours of very light activity.
heh.
I just read: "Hula can scale up to 200,000 registered users on a single properly configured server, with 50,000 users simultaneously accessing the system." -- http://www.hula-project.com/Hula_Server
Then I read your post..
It's *unbelievable* how much memory evolution uses.
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:41:26AM -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:54:57AM -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
I will monitor this over the next 48 hours and see how it fares and report back.
The imap leak lives - and this may be specific to imap.
Anyway - heres the summary of the test - over 2.5 days from
march 01 08:28 to march 3 22:38
evo + data server managed to consume 800 MiB of vm and over 200 MiB of rss.
This is a single imap account and a private calendar.
Details:
Date : Command vsize rss ----------- : ------------ ------ ----- 01-08:28-59 : evolution 202004 62236 ... 03-22:38-01 : evolution 343548 199932
and data-server ..
01-08:42-01 : evolution-data- 169912 13440 03-22:38-12 : evolution-data- 471248 17184
Yikes!!! 500 MiB for evo data server in 2 1/2 days!! This is not really an improvement over older revs.
Hope this is useful to someone ...
gene/
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 22:47 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
Hope this is useful to someone ...
You know, it looks like you're collecting useful data here, although I'm can't say for sure. But I'm sure this is the wrong place to be posting it, because I doubt there are any evolution developers reading this list. Why don't you join evolution-hackers@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
and let them know the results of your investigations. Especially given that Federico Mena-Quintero
http://primates.ximian.com/~federico/news.html
has been tracking down memory leaks in GNOME in general. I'm fairly sure that they'd want to know if you've uncovered genuine problems, and I'm also certain that if you have then posting the information here is useless.
If the evolution-hackers list doesn't seem appropriate then post to evolution@lists.ximian.com:
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Most of the developers hang out there too.
Best, Darren
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 00:47 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 05:19 +0800, Colin Charles wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 10:12 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
Evolution 2.0.4, a bugfix release, has been released:
http://codeblogs.ximian.com/blogs/evolution/archives/000449.html
Will we get this for FC3? (We didn't get 2.0.3.)
I just did these, as Test updates (see the flurry of emails that just hit this list) - please download and try them out.
David,
It's now two weeks later, and those packages have not made it out to mainstream FC3 yet. Is there a reason for it? Is there anything we can do to speed up the testing phase?
Cheers,
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 18:06 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
David,
It's now two weeks later, and those packages have not made it out to mainstream FC3 yet. Is there a reason for it? Is there anything we can do to speed up the testing phase?
And it's now five days since Rodolfo's message :-)
What is the delay with Evolution updates (there are a couple of things which are not major bugs but really annoy me and I'm hoping they'll be fixed)?
Best, Darren
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 22:01 +0000, D. D. Brierton wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 18:06 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
David,
It's now two weeks later, and those packages have not made it out to mainstream FC3 yet. Is there a reason for it? Is there anything we can do to speed up the testing phase?
And it's now five days since Rodolfo's message :-)
What is the delay with Evolution updates (there are a couple of things which are not major bugs but really annoy me and I'm hoping they'll be fixed)?
They should be available now (see emails to fedora-announce-list); sorry about the delay.
On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 16:54 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
They should be available now (see emails to fedora-announce-list); sorry about the delay.
No apologies necessary. I installed them today. Thanks. (Didn't fix my problem though. I'm off to search bugzilla.ximian.com)
Best, Darren