https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=134426#c1
Poul's positng seems to be similar to #134426.
2004-10-03 (일), 13:03 -0400, Colin Walters 쓰시길:
On Sun, 2004-10-03 at 17:20 +0100, Paul wrote:
Version 1.
User 1 logs in, uses xmms, logs out User 2 logs in, xmms reports soundcard blocked
Version 2.
User 1 logs in, uses xmms, logs into a couple of consoles (use bittorrent, do an update and something else). Logs out User 2 logs in, xmms reports soundcard blocked.
What should happen is for version 1, user 2 should gain control over the soundcard.
Absolutely. If User 2 doesn't gain control that's a bug. Can you be sure that /var/run/console/console.lock doesn't exist after User 1 logs out?
Not sure what should happen for version 2, but I think once user 1 has logged out of the X session, then user 2 should gain permission.
Yes, I think it would be best if user 2 gained permission as well, but unless the device supports hardware mixing you're going to lose anyways. In this case you need a sound server. But if you do have hardware mixing one nicer way to do this might be to modify pam_console to use ACLs on the devices instead of changing ownership.
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list