RPM build error
by Ranjan Maitra
Hello,
I am trying to build an RPM for sylfilter available at
http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/sylfilter/src/sylfilter-%{?version}.tar.gz
with the attached .spec file but I get the following errors:
.....
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/include/sylfilter/bayes-filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/blacklist-filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-gdbm.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-qdbm.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-sqlite.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-manager.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-utils.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/ngram-filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/textcontent-filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/whitelist-filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/wordsep-filter.h
/usr/lib64/libsylfilter.a
/usr/lib64/libsylfilter.la
/usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so
/usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so.0
/usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so.0.0.0
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/include/sylfilter/bayes-filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/blacklist-filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-gdbm.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-qdbm.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs-sqlite.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-kvs.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-manager.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter-utils.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/ngram-filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/textcontent-filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/whitelist-filter.h
/usr/include/sylfilter/wordsep-filter.h
/usr/lib64/libsylfilter.a
/usr/lib64/libsylfilter.la
/usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so
/usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so.0
/usr/lib64/libsylfilter.so.0.0.0
Not sure what the issue is, but wondering if anyone had any suggestions?
Many thanks and best wishes,
Ranjan
--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be
deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate.
For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use
appropriate addresses.
____________________________________________________________
GET FREE 5GB EMAIL - Check out spam free email with many cool features!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/email to find out more!
9 years, 3 months
WiFi permanently disappeared after booting test kernel
by Mike Fleetwood
Hi,
On my netbook I booted a test kernel 3.8.0-rc4+ I compiled. Now after
booting back into my regular Fedora kernel 3.6.11-5.fc17.i686.PAE my
wifi network device remains permanently disappeared. No wifi networks
displayed in Network Manager gui. Also the Network Manager syslog
messages make it look like the device has completely disappeared.
Suggestions for restoring wifi welcome.
Thanks
Mike
Fragment of Network Manager syslog messages when working before
--8<--
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> monitoring kernel
firmware directory '/lib/firmware'.
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> rfkill2: found WiFi
radio killswitch (at
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.3/0000:01:00.0/ieee80211/phy0/rfkill2)
(driver ath9k)
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> rfkill0: found WiFi
radio killswitch (at /sys/devices/platform/eeepc/rfkill/rfkill0)
(platform driver eeepc)
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> rfkill4: found WWAN
radio killswitch (at /sys/devices/platform/eeepc/rfkill/rfkill4)
(platform driver eeepc)
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> WiFi enabled by radio
killswitch; enabled by state file
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> WWAN enabled by radio
killswitch; enabled by state file
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> WiMAX enabled by
radio killswitch; enabled by state file
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> Networking is enabled
by state file
...
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): using
nl80211 for WiFi device control
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <warn> (wlan0): driver
supports Access Point (AP) mode
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): new 802.11
WiFi device (driver: 'ath9k' ifindex: 3)
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): exported as
/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): now managed
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): device state
change: unmanaged -> unavailable (reason 'managed') [10 20 2]
Jan 18 23:01:53 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> (wlan0): bringing up device.
...
Jan 18 23:01:59 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> Activation (wlan0)
successful, device activated.
Jan 18 23:01:59 edge NetworkManager[479]: <info> Activation (wlan0)
Stage 5 of 5 (IPv4 Commit) complete.
Fragment of Network Manager syslog messages when broken after
--8<--
Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> monitoring kernel
firmware directory '/lib/firmware'.
Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> rfkill0: found WiFi
radio killswitch (at /sys/devices/platform/eeepc/rfkill/rfkill0)
(platform driver eeepc)
Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> rfkill2: found WWAN
radio killswitch (at /sys/devices/platform/eeepc/rfkill/rfkill2)
(platform driver eeepc)
Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> WiFi disabled by
radio killswitch; enabled by state file
Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> WWAN enabled by radio
killswitch; enabled by state file
Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> WiMAX enabled by
radio killswitch; enabled by state file
Jan 28 18:43:26 edge NetworkManager[466]: <info> Networking is enabled
by state file
No (wlan0) related NetworkManager syslog messages afterwards at all.
9 years, 8 months
losing WiFi Access - prompted for password
by SternData
F18...
Over the last few days, I'm getting prompted to re-enter my password for
my WiFi network. It's not the router because no other device on the
network seems to be having problems.
Potential changes on my system include
May 07 21:39:32 Updated: 1:wpa_supplicant-1.1-1.fc18.x86_64
May 25 15:33:44 Installed: kernel-3.9.3-201.fc18.x86_64
May 27 08:06:42 Updated:
1:NetworkManager-glib-0.9.8.1-3.git20130514.fc18.x86_64
May 27 08:06:47 Updated: 1:NetworkManager-0.9.8.1-3.git20130514.fc18.x86_64
May 27 08:06:53 Updated:
network-manager-applet-0.9.8.1-4.git20130514.fc18.x86_64
Given that this has really started the day before yesterday, I suspect
it has something to do with the NetworkManager update. Is anyone else
having this problem?
(Please -- do not tell me to "dump the evil NetworkManager". I'm trying
to solve a problem here, not make some stand against the tide. Thanks.)
--
-- Steve
9 years, 11 months
Sound not working on 3.12.x and 3.13.x kernels for Fedora 20
by dwoody1
I installed F20 shortly after it's release. Everything worked as expected.
All kernels released since then have resulted in the sound not working.
The kernel that works is 3.11.10-301.fc20.i686+PAE. Sound does not work
for the 3.12.x and 3.13.x kernels.
I have searched for a solution for this and found several
recommendations but none worked for me.
I have compared a listing of the modules (lsmod) from the working kernel
and non-working kennel and both lists have the same sound modules loaded
(there is a size difference in some of the modules, but I expected that).
I have compared the output from amixer for both working and non-working
kernels and they are exactly the same.
The sound related packages that are installed are:
pulseaudio-libs-glib2-4.0-13.gitf81e3.fc20.i686
alsa-tools-firmware-1.0.27-3.fc20.i686
alsa-utils-1.0.27.2-4.fc20.i686
alsamixergui-0.9.0-0.16.rc2.fc20.i686
alsa-lib-1.0.27.2-2.fc20.i686
pulseaudio-libs-4.0-13.gitf81e3.fc20.i686
alsa-firmware-1.0.27-2.fc20.noarch
I am not very knowledgeable about sound. I am sure I need to check other
configuration settings but I do not know which files are relevant.
Any help will be appreciated,
David
9 years, 12 months
KDE using sudo instead of su
by Emmett Culley
I've noticed recently that when I run yumex, or most any other app that needs root permission, from the launcher menu, I am prompted for my user password, instead of the root password. So I assume sudo is being used instead of su.
The "run backend with sudo" is not checked in yumex preferences. If I set the menu item to execute as root and add --root to the yumex call I get the root pasword request but then yumex doesn't start.
It is interesting that my other workstation works differently. That is, yumex doesn't prompt for the root password until it is about to do something that requires root permissison. But it is asking for the root password, not my user password, as are all other apps that require root permissions.
Any ideas how to get apps to require the root password instead of my user password?
Emmett
10 years
A new Thinkpad X240 touchpad issue
by Steve Underwood
Hi,
I just rebooted my Thinkpad X240 for the first time in a few weeks, and
now clicking the touchpad doesn't behave properly. I assume a yum update
since the last reboot has changed something, and not in a good way. If I
click the edge of the pad I get the correct left/middle/right button
kind of behaviour, but if I click in the middle of the pad I get quirky
results. I used to get the effect of a left mouse button.
Is this a regression, or has something purposefully changed which means
I need to alter the xorg configuration files?
Regards,
Steve
10 years
Small Home server - HDD/SDD
by Javier Perez
HI
I have a small home server (photos, videos, music) that is reaching full
capacity.
It is a 750GB, partitioned as a 50G OS and 700G Data + swap
The mobo, an Intel DG31PR mobo has 1 PATA and 4 SATA ports (3GB/s).
Currently it is running FC20, having been continuously upgraded from almost
Fedora 1 I think
I got a 2TB WD red HDD for it.
My plan is to put the OS on a USB stick ( San Disk Low Profile 64GB
SDCZ33-064G-B35 ) and use the whole 2TB for Data. I'd rather not have a
PATA SDD, and I do not want to lose one of the SATA ports. Eventually I
want to have a system with 4 HDDs, in a Raid 1+0 configuration to prevent
data loss.
I have some questions.
1. I could use ext4 on all HDDs eventually. But I wonder, can I use ZFS?
Specially I would like to have the ability to expand the single HDD into a
Raid once I get the second HDD as painlessly as possible. If I use ext4 I
guess I will have to backup/create raid system/reformat/restore the data. I
have the idea that zfs only needs to be aware that there is a new drive and
it will expand the filesystem accordingly. I'd rather not use LVM. I was
burned by it once.
2. Is the USB OS ok? I do not feel I am losing that much, after all, it is
a system that will be mostly on at home.
3.Should I add hibernation to it? How quickly will it come back from
hibernation if someone requests data?
Is there anything I should know I am not taking into consideration?
Thanks!
JP
--
------------------------------
/\_/\
|O O| pepebuho(a)gmail.com
~~~~ Javier Perez
~~~~ While the night runs
~~~~ toward the day...
m m Pepebuho watches
from his high perch.
10 years
perl
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
I do not understand,
I have 2 machines fedora 20 x86_64.
On one my application run fine, on the other one I get an error:
Perl API version v5.16.0 of PDL::Core does not match v5.18.0 at /usr/lib64/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 213.
Compilation failed in require at (eval 42) line 6.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 42) line 6.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /home/pdupre/Spectroscopy/Stepram/Input_windows.pm line 12.
At line 12 there is
use PDL ;
Both perl-PDL are the same.
How can I debug?
Thanks
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years
Re: rpmbuild
by Patrick Dupre
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Patrick Laimbock
> Sent: 04/30/14 08:13 PM
> To: users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On 30-04-14 19:56, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> [snip]
> >>> File not found by glob: /home/pdupre/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/perl-tk-zinc-3.303-1.fc20.x86_64/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/tk*
> >>>
> >>> what is wrong?
> >>
> >> One or more files were installed that were not listed in the %files
> >> section in the spec file. Add the missing file(s) to the spec file.
> >>
> > OK, but which ones ?
>
> You compare the files listed in the %files section to what is installed
> in BUILDROOT/perl-tk-zinc-.../...
ls ../BUILDROOT/perl-tk-zinc-3.303-1.fc20.x86_64/usr
bin lib lib64 share src
!!
compared to:
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Copyright README
%{_bindir}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/*.1.gz
%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/*
%{perl_vendorarch}/tk*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
How can make it match?
> It's a manual process.
>
> HTH,
> Patrick
> --
> users mailing list
> users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | |
Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===========================================================================
10 years
Gnome weather extension as malware?
by Robert Moskowitz
Is anyone running the Gnome weather extension? I have disabled it and
my system is running better. Or rather FIrefox is working 'right' again.
This extension gets its weather information from the Norway weather
service, and you can't change this. I had noticed that many places I
was going to in Firefox took a long time to reply. It was as if Firefox
was hanging, and other Firefox windows were not responding either.
I finally fired up wireshark and I was seeing that requests for things
like apis.google.com (or some such) was being routed through a .no site
(by reverse lookup on IP address). Perhaps this extension was altering
Firefox's proxy settings.
I don't have the time or resources to do a serious review, but I am
pointing this out and perhaps others may have noticed this as well. Or
are suffering and not knowing it. This may be accidental or really
actually malicious; just don't know.
10 years
