Which repo an rpm is from
by Neal Becker
Is there a way to query dnf to tell which which repo a given file or a given rpm came from?
Thanks,
Neal
4 years, 1 month
a personal "user" report - Xfce
by David
I am a Fedora user.
I like to share my experience with
Fedora with other computer users in the world outside
of Fedora, but they ridicule and berate me ( even Linux users ),
for not using their so-called "normal operating system." So I turn to
my potential
friends in the Fedora community for moral support.
Thank you all for the warm welcome.
I use Rawhide, and lately I use Xfce, but I prefer Gnome,
and Plasma ( actually have never tried Plasma in Fedora, but
it is on my bucket list )
The benefit to using Xfce on Rawhide, is that you get a
stable desktop environment, that very rarely changes, but you
get to test Fedora's latest version of system components
like systemd 245 and kernel 5.6.0-rc5.
It just may be, that I am the only person on Earth
( besides the maintainer of Xfce in Fedora ??, whoever
that is ), that is interested in this topic.
Today's fine update,
brought the latest anaconda packages, dracut, firefox, glibc,
perl-(numerous packages ),
inxi ( which I use regularly ), info, iwl####-firmware, kbd, linux-firmware,
pcre2, vim, webkit, python3-cssselect2, shadow-utils,
set-troubleshoot-plugins
and most of all the initial pieces of kernel rc6, and wine 5.4.1
That update went smoothly, as has most of my past 90 Rawhide updates.
I assume that if I were running the pre-Beta of Version 32, that I would
get almost similar
packages, but just with the fc32 suffix instead of the fc33. I do plan
to have an install
of Fedora 32 on hardware, but the COVID-19 hysteria has turned my world
upside-down.
One thing a Rawhide user can do to minimise the risk, is to install the
update for each
package separately. But I need to learn more about that, before telling
people that is the
way to do it. Another tip, I have heard is to not do the update from a
graphical environment,
but instead through the tty. I have not found that to be necessary.
My goal is to show people how to use Rawhide, but I am not there yet.
Mostly, as to why they
should run Rawhide instead of Tumbleweed, or Neon Developer's Unstable
Edition, or Mageia
Cauldron, or OpenMandriva Cooker. Rawhide is superior, is the reason,
but I need to be able
to explain that in logical sensical terminology.
I am a novice Rawhide user, and probably always will be. ( But even Mr.
Torvalds announced
once when introducing his new kernel idea, that it was just a tiny project
). Who knows, maybe
someday in 2040, I will fork Rawhide, and call it "FudOS."
I do not know how to write a "hello world " program. But maybe I will
learn that someday. I am pretty good at playing FreeCell in Aisleriot,
and not to shabby
at Gnome Mahjongg.
My long term goal is to learn more about the things that Linux novices
struggle with like
printing and wi-fi, and video cards and all the things a gamer must do to
set up a AAA game
with the latest packages. I am not there yet, but occasionally watch a
YouTube video to learn.
Cheers,
David Locklear
Arcola, Texas USA
4 years, 1 month
Re: Teo En Ming's Linux From Scratch (LFS) 20200302-systemd Bootable
Live CD/DVD Kernel Panic
by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Hi,
The iso is about 250 MB. The download links can be found here:
https://github.com/teo-en-ming/teo-en-ming-linux/blob/master/ISO%20Downlo...
On 2020-03-18 02:08, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> TDTEM,
>
> Interesting! How big is the file system? I would like to try
> creating a VM with this - I couldn't find a download link . .
>
> Thanks,
>
> Phil.
>
>
> On 2020-03-18 03:31, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
>> Subject: Teo En Ming's Linux From Scratch (LFS) 20200302-systemd
>> Bootable Live CD/DVD Kernel Panic
>>
>> Good day from Singapore to all Linux users,
>>
>> Recently, on 12 March 2020, I have successfully created my own custom
>> Linux distribution which I affectionately call it Teo En Ming Linux.
>> My custom Linux distribution is based on the most basic Linux From
>> Scratch (LFS) 20200302-systemd book and Linux kernel 5.5.7. I am able
>> to boot it successfully on
>> my Toshiba 1 TB 3.5 inch SATA internal harddisk /dev/sdb2.
>>
>> After the initial success, I wanted to make a bootable Live CD/DVD of
>> my Linux From Scratch system. I followed Jimmy Anderson's guide (which
>> was written more
>> than 7 years ago on 20 Jan 2013) and modified his guide in trying to
>> make it work with LFS 20200302-systemd book.
>>
>> You may refer to the following guides on how I created a bootable Live
>> CD/DVD of my Linux From Scratch system.
>>
>> Blog post #1: "How to create a Bootable Live CD/DVD from your Linux
>> From Scratch (LFS) build"
>>
>> Link:
>> https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.com/2020/03/how-to-create-bootable-live-cddvd...
>>
>> Blog post #2: "Patching Linux Kernel 5.5.7 to Add Support for AUFS
>> Filesystem"
>>
>> Link:
>> https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.com/2020/03/patching-linux-kernel-557-to-add....
>>
>> When I booted up my bootable Live CD/DVD, I got a kernel panic.
>>
>> Looking at the following screenshot, it seems that my 64-bit Live CD
>> booted in 32-bit mode.
>>
>> Screenshot:
>> https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-P_EcnlhuDIQ/XnDso3sjNZI/AAAAAAAAAqw/qa5EZoHQQa...
>>
>> Notice the "trampoline_32bit" and "booted via startup_32()" lines on
>> the above screenshot.
>>
>> The following screenshot illustrates the kernel panic.
>>
>> Screenshot:
>> https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uSNEk19fG7s/XnDtZf-80_I/AAAAAAAAAq4/Q-GAHKnWe_...
>>
>> My guess is that my 64-bit Live CD booted up in 32-bit mode, and when
>> it tried to execute /sbin/init (symlink to systemd binary) after
>> mounting the squashfs root file system, which is 64-bit, it resulted
>> in a kernel panic. What I am trying to say is that the 64-bit Linux
>> kernel on the Live CD boots up in 32-bit mode (my guess), and then
>> tried to execute purely 64-bit binaries, which results in a kernel
>> panic.
>>
>> Please advise me on how I can resolve this issue and produce a working
>> Live CD of my LFS system without kernel panic.
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):
>>
>> [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of
>> U.S. Embassy Workers
>>
>> Link:
>> https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html
>>
>> ********************************************************************************************
>>
>> Singaporean Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic
>> Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019 and refugee seeking attempts at the
>> United Nations Refugee Agency Bangkok (21 Mar 2017), in Taiwan (5 Aug
>> 2019) and Australia (25 Dec 2019 to 9 Jan 2020):
>>
>> [1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/
>>
>> [2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/
>>
>> [3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming
>>
>> -----END EMAIL SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
4 years, 1 month
resize an lv
by François Patte
Bonjour,
I need to extend my /home directory which is a logical volume.
I read that I can use lvextend without unmounting the /home partition.
But what about resize2fs that I must use after lvextend?
Just to be sure: my home partition is contained in physical volume which
is a raid array (md5), I have nothing to do with this array? (/dev/md5 =
800Gb, /home = 500Gb, I want to extend it to 800Gb)
Thank you.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
FSF
https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-fr...
4 years, 1 month
Re: Which repo an rpm is from
by Iosif Fettich
Hi there,
> Is there a way to query dnf to tell which which repo a given file or a given
> rpm came from?
According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Yum_to_DNF_Cheatsheet,
find-repos-of-install: [Warning] Use dnf list installed pkg instead
On my WS, although it is [very!] slow, I get for example
$ dnf list perl-interpreter-5.30.1-449.fc31.x86_64
[...]
perl-interpreter.x86_64 4:5.30.1-449.fc31
@updates
Which I assume/hope means actually
'Fedora 31 - x86_64 - Updates', and *not*
'Fedora Modular 31 - x86_64 - Updates' or
'RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Free - Updates' or
'RPM Fusion for Fedora 31 - Nonfree - Updates'
Hmm.
Iosif Fettich
4 years, 1 month
missing from sudoers file after update
by Ranjan Maitra
Hello,
I am on F31 and have always used sudo. This morning, after a while, I finally rebooted and am on the 5.5.8-200.fc31.x86_64 kernel. However, I appear to have lost my sudo access.
I get: that my username "is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported."
Not sure how this happened. How do I get back into sudoers? I am not even sure I, (in fact I think that I do not), have a root account.
Any suggestions? This is strange.
Ranjan
--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses.
4 years, 1 month
firefox
by Patrick Dupre
Hello,
For a while now. firefox has a different behavior (font) for a specific web
site.
Actually, I have 2 machines, with the same installation, but the fonts
used for a specific website differs from one machine to the other one.
The preferences are identical (as much as I can say).
Is there a configuration that I could check?
I do not see any thing trivial.
Thanks
===========================================================================
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988
===========================================================================
4 years, 2 months
Teo En Ming's Linux From Scratch (LFS) 20200302-systemd Bootable Live
CD/DVD Kernel Panic
by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
Subject: Teo En Ming's Linux From Scratch (LFS) 20200302-systemd
Bootable Live CD/DVD Kernel Panic
Good day from Singapore to all Linux users,
Recently, on 12 March 2020, I have successfully created my own custom
Linux distribution which I affectionately call it Teo En Ming Linux.
My custom Linux distribution is based on the most basic Linux From
Scratch (LFS) 20200302-systemd book and Linux kernel 5.5.7. I am able to
boot it successfully on
my Toshiba 1 TB 3.5 inch SATA internal harddisk /dev/sdb2.
After the initial success, I wanted to make a bootable Live CD/DVD of my
Linux From Scratch system. I followed Jimmy Anderson's guide (which was
written more
than 7 years ago on 20 Jan 2013) and modified his guide in trying to
make it work with LFS 20200302-systemd book.
You may refer to the following guides on how I created a bootable Live
CD/DVD of my Linux From Scratch system.
Blog post #1: "How to create a Bootable Live CD/DVD from your Linux From
Scratch (LFS) build"
Link:
https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.com/2020/03/how-to-create-bootable-live-cddvd...
Blog post #2: "Patching Linux Kernel 5.5.7 to Add Support for AUFS
Filesystem"
Link:
https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.com/2020/03/patching-linux-kernel-557-to-add....
When I booted up my bootable Live CD/DVD, I got a kernel panic.
Looking at the following screenshot, it seems that my 64-bit Live CD
booted in 32-bit mode.
Screenshot:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-P_EcnlhuDIQ/XnDso3sjNZI/AAAAAAAAAqw/qa5EZoHQQa...
Notice the "trampoline_32bit" and "booted via startup_32()" lines on the
above screenshot.
The following screenshot illustrates the kernel panic.
Screenshot:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uSNEk19fG7s/XnDtZf-80_I/AAAAAAAAAq4/Q-GAHKnWe_...
My guess is that my 64-bit Live CD booted up in 32-bit mode, and when it
tried to execute /sbin/init (symlink to systemd binary) after mounting
the squashfs root file system, which is 64-bit, it resulted in a kernel
panic. What I am trying to say is that the 64-bit Linux kernel on the
Live CD boots up in 32-bit mode (my guess), and then tried to execute
purely 64-bit binaries, which results in a kernel panic.
Please advise me on how I can resolve this issue and produce a working
Live CD of my LFS system without kernel panic.
Thank you very much.
--
-----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-----
The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):
[The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of
U.S. Embassy Workers
Link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/01/science/sonic-attack-cuba-microwave.html
********************************************************************************************
Singaporean Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's Academic
Qualifications as at 14 Feb 2019 and refugee seeking attempts at the
United Nations Refugee Agency Bangkok (21 Mar 2017), in Taiwan (5 Aug
2019) and Australia (25 Dec 2019 to 9 Jan 2020):
[1] https://tdtemcerts.wordpress.com/
[2] https://tdtemcerts.blogspot.sg/
[3] https://www.scribd.com/user/270125049/Teo-En-Ming
-----END EMAIL SIGNATURE-----
4 years, 2 months
