users June 2023

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

68 participants
87 discussions

by ogio.spam

Hi all, I experience a long time after password to obtain the desktop ready. Just to be clear, the problem is only with a user. Another user is not showing this behaviour. The good user is a new fresh user, the not working is a user with the home directory copied from an old Fedora with KDE. I worked on startup, removing all of them, but the problem is still there. There is a way to check what is appening after enter password? Tnx Ogio

11 months

9
10
0 / 0

where to submit a bug against "xv"?

by home user

"xv" does not handle "webp" images. I do not see "xv" in the Redhat bugzilla menu of components. Where do I submit a bug against xv?

11 months

8
21
0 / 0

simple scan default printer?

by ToddAndMargo

Hi All, Fedora 37 simple-scan-42.5-1.fc37.x86_64 Any way to get Simple Scan to default to a different printer? Right now it defaults to "Print to LPR" Many thanks, -T -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Computers are like air conditioners. They malfunction when you open windows ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

11 months

4
5
0 / 0

avoid nouveau with kernel 6.3?

by Neal Becker

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Avoid-Nouveau-Linux-6.3 -- *Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it*

11 months

5
5
0 / 0

Could not resolve host: mirrors.fedoraproject.org

by Jeffrey Walton

Hi Everyone, 'dnf update' is failing for me for F38 on x86_64. Is anyone else experiencing failures during DNF update? I want to ensure something did not recently break with systemd (that I have to fix). Jeff ----- $ sudo dnf update Fedora 38 - x86_64 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:00 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'fedora': - Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-38&arch=x86_64 [Could not resolve host: mirrors.fedoraproject.org] Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'fedora': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-38&arch=x86_64 [Could not resolve host: mirrors.fedoraproject.org] ----- $ nslookup mirrors.fedoraproject.org Server: 127.0.0.53 Address: 127.0.0.53#53 Non-authoritative answer: mirrors.fedoraproject.org canonical name = wildcard.fedoraproject.org. Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 67.219.144.68 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 152.19.134.142 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 140.211.169.196 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 34.221.3.152 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 38.145.60.20 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 38.145.60.21 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 8.43.85.67 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 152.19.134.198 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 8.43.85.73 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed6 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 2600:1f14:fad:5c02:7c8a:72d0:1c58:c189 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 2600:2701:4000:5211:dead:beef:fe:fed3 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 2604:1580:fe00:0:dead:beef:cafe:fed1 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 2605:bc80:3010:600:dead:beef:cafe:fed9 Name: wildcard.fedoraproject.org Address: 2620:52:3:1:dead:beef:cafe:fed7

11 months

2
1
0 / 0

Startup Problems

by Robert McBroom

F38 starts to a blank screen with a cursor in the upper left corner of the screen. Does not respond to keyboard or mouse. The display manager is supposed to be sddm. Editing the grub entry to start in single user mode gets me to a terminal screen where I can login. startx begins but fails to connect to the X server. ------------------ xf86EnableIOPorts: failed to set IOPL for I/O (Operation not permitted) xinit: connection to X server lost waiting for X server to shut down (II) Server terminated successfully (0). Closing log file. ----------------------- xinit brings up a terminal window where a lxsession will give a graphical desktop. gnome and kde plasma fail to start. xfce gives a desktop with no window bar on windows and mouse window operations Which is not really usable. ]# systemctl get-default graphical.target Note: found "3" on the kernel commandline, which overrides the default unit. ________________ What do I need to do to get the system to boot to the desktop?

11 months, 1 week

4
7
0 / 0

verifying Fedora downloads

by Tim

Hi, Having just downloaded a couple of F38 spins to try, I had a look at the verify instructions (both identical) on https://fedoraproject.org/spins/mate/download/ https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/download/ ------------------------ begin paste ------------------------ Verify your download Verify your download for security and integrity using the proper checksum file. If there is a good signature from one of the Fedora keys, and the SHA256 checksum matches, then the download is valid. Download the checksum file into the same directory as the image you downloaded. Import Fedora's GPG key(s) curl -O https://fedoraproject.org/fedora.gpg You can verify the details of the GPG key(s) here. Verify the checksum file is valid gpgv --keyring ./fedora.gpg Fedora-Spins-38-1.6-x86_64-CHECKSUM Verify the checksum matches sha256sum -c Fedora-Spins-38-1.6-x86_64-CHECKSUM If the output states that the file is valid, then it's ready to use! --------------------- end paste ---------------------- The "download the checksum file" bit contians a link to download the checksum with your browser. Fair enough, but since there were command lines to copy and paste for the other two bits, I would have put a command line to fetch the checksum, too. And I wish that sha256sum command output was a bit more structured or controllable, the blob it outputs isn't the easiest thing to read: ------------------------ begin paste ------------------------ $ sha256sum -c Fedora-Spins-38-1.6-x86_64-CHECKSUM sha256sum: Fedora-Budgie-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: No such file or directory Fedora-Budgie-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: FAILED open or read sha256sum: Fedora-Cinnamon-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: No such file or directory Fedora-Cinnamon-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: FAILED open or read Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: OK sha256sum: Fedora-LXDE-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: No such file or directory Fedora-LXDE-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: FAILED open or read sha256sum: Fedora-LXQt-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: No such file or directory Fedora-LXQt-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: FAILED open or read Fedora-MATE_Compiz-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: OK sha256sum: Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: No such file or directory Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: FAILED open or read sha256sum: Fedora-Sway-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: No such file or directory Fedora-Sway-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: FAILED open or read sha256sum: Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: No such file or directory Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: FAILED open or read sha256sum: Fedora-i3-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: No such file or directory Fedora-i3-Live-x86_64-38-1.6.iso: FAILED open or read sha256sum: WARNING: 19 lines are improperly formatted sha256sum: WARNING: 8 listed files could not be read --------------------- end paste ---------------------- I would have spaced that out better for humans to read, perhaps list the non-existent files separately, or have an option to skip them. Bizarrely, there is an option to say nothing about the OK files. -- uname -rsvp Linux 3.10.0-1160.90.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu May 4 15:21:22 UTC 2023 x86_64 Boilerplate: All unexpected mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted. I will only get to see the messages that are posted to the mailing list.

11 months, 1 week

2
2
0 / 0

Gnome Nautilus and no thumbnails from connected Android storage

by lejeczek

Hi guys. Despite having "Show Thumbnails => All files" in my Nautilus, I do not get thumbnails on my Android phone when connected via USB. That should work, in F34, right? many thanks, L.

11 months, 1 week

8
21
0 / 0

1st problem when installing f38

by François Patte

Bonjour, I am following advices given in answering my previous post "issue...." and I get f38 installer. The installer complains that there is a duplicate UUID on some disks : parts sde1 and sdf1 That's true! Running blkid gives: /dev/sde1: UUID="4a28174a-f38b-4938-233f-85f76ce585a8" UUID_SUB="88a5f939-72d4-b330-95e6-52fa0b826203" LABEL="dipankar:4" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-01" ^^^^^^^^^^^ /dev/sdf1: UUID="4a28174a-f38b-4938-233f-85f76ce585a8" UUID_SUB="99b46805-aa31-1711-21dc-89cb7177d025" LABEL="dipankar:4" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-01" ^^^^^^^^^^^^ But it is not the only case and it does not complain for the other one: /dev/sde2: UUID="5240f249-7feb-6832-6682-805f97c4abea" UUID_SUB="0e21ab45-27a2-f588-48a9-cd46d0dc6237" LABEL="dipankar:5" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-02" ^^^^^^^^^^^ /dev/sdf2: UUID="5240f249-7feb-6832-6682-805f97c4abea" UUID_SUB="5838df23-817e-f3cb-19f3-31da8d3e99d0" LABEL="dipankar:5" TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="c257bd85-02" ^^^^^^^^^^^^ What does this mean? And what shall I do? The installer suggests to unplug these disks (or at list one of these disks) but, as you can see these disks are members of a raid array with the swap, /var and a crypted partition (sde1 and sdf1) and /home (sde2 and sdf2).... Is it possible to unplug one of the disks (say sdf) and make an install with a raid1 in degraded mode (+lvm) then, when the install is finished, to plug again the disk sdf and synchronise the partitions with mdadm? Moreover, I don't understand why the problem occurs only with sde1 and sdf1 and not with the other disks (sde2, sdf2 as already pointed) : I have 6 disks, and more partitions, paired in pairs as raid members. Thank you for lights. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)6 7892 5822 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte FSF https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/presenting-shoetool-happy-holidays-fr...

11 months, 1 week

5
11
0 / 0

Desktop scaling on 3 different Thinkpad X1

by Frederic Muller

Hi! At each new Fedora release I have 3 thinkpads to 'upgrade'. In fact I do fresh installs for those and have a list of steps to perfom so I don't forget anything (list which I maintain and update at each release as things do change over time). Desktop scaling is always tricky and this time I only get it to work on 1 of those 3 Thinkpads. They are 3rd, 6th and 8th generation ones. Currently it only works on the 8th gen one. I type this: gsettings set org.gnome.mutter experimental-features "['scale-monitor-framebuffer']" On 3rd gen I can only do 100% and 200% and on 6th gen I cannot even do 200% as it says there is some HW limitation message preventing to change anything. Any advice on how to troubleshoot the issue would be very welcome. Thank you very much. Fred

11 months, 1 week

1
1
0 / 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →