At 12:55 PM -0500 11/2/05, Derek Martin wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WkHPBKJ2pKcVUM5H" Content-Disposition: inline
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Robert Locke wrote:
I've been trying to ignore this thread, but Derek,
Next time try clicking on the link that Rahul provided (before assuming), which just to repeat was:
Well, I don't mean to be rude, but simply put, no. If one were to follow every link that someone posted in a thread they were participating in, they would never leave the computer. There would be time for nothing else in the day.
Now that you've made foolish posts on this twice, I will tell you /do/ /not/ /respond/ /to/ /posts/ /you/ /haven't/ /read/. If you don't read a post you have no place posting a response. Or two.
If you want people to read links that you post, it would be helpful if you provided some clue as to what information is there, and/or why you want them to look at it. If you don't want to do that, fine... but you shouldn't expect that people will necessarily follow your links either.
Get a clue yourself or /be/ /quiet/. ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' mailto:tonynelson@georgeanelson.com ' http://www.georgeanelson.com/