Date: Tuesday, August 03, 2021 02:22:47 +0800
From: Ed Greshko <ed.greshko(a)greshko.com>
On 03/08/2021 02:18, home user wrote:
> On 8/2/21 12:15 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> On 2021-08-02 10:59 a.m., home user wrote:
>>> I've been asked to join a "Slack" team. I did a "dnf
provides
>>> slack" and got nothing. Before I try doing things the hard way
>>> (via the Slack web site), is slack actually not available via
>>> dnf, or did I do the query incorrectly (wrong name?)?
>>
>> slack is not open-source software, so it's not going to be
>> available by dnf unless there's an external repo that you add
>> yourself.
>>
>>> By the way, I see from "dnf provides zoom" that zoom is now
>>> available via dnf.
>>
>> Same here. I don't know what command you ran, but zoom is also
>> not available for the same reason.
>
> bash.4[~]: dnf provides zoom
> zoom-5.4.53350.1027-1.x86_64 : Zoom, #1 Video Conferencing and Web
> Conferencing
> : Service
> Repo : @System
> Matched from:
> Provide : zoom = 5.4.53350.1027-1
>
> bash.5[~]:
>
> Am I misunderstanding dnf's output?
Looks as if you've downloaded something and installed it manually.
Otherwise you'd get some output that would show what repo it came
from. Like....
Repo : fedora
Repo : updates
The name on that zoom info is also a clue. If it had come from a
fedora/redhat/centos repository it would have a repository indicator
"fc33", "fc34", "el7.<rh/centos>" on the package name.
Zoom has
packages available for a range of linux releases available from their
web site, but as with slack, I've not found a repository reference
that can be added to dnf so you need to download their package and do
a local install.