Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
You suggest we should not differentiate between different kinds of
memberships which I think is OK as it both simplifies the Statutes,
bookkeeping and accounting, and isn't as obscure to (potential) new
members. If anyone thinks differently though, now is the time to tell us
;-)
Not exactly. I'd like to have legal persons pay more than natural
persons. i.e. having different mandatory/maximum fees for both. But
without a difference in number of votes or so.
If we're not getting any contra's, the concept of honorary
members is
getting in the Statutes. The way someone could become an honorary member
is to be determined at a later point when we have something drafted up.
I'm sure there'll be something such as a 3/4 majority GMM has to agree
and maybe something like only the board can propose such, although I'm
not much in favor of the minimum 5 years of membership limit.
Me neither. Say 3/4 of GMM and the board Concordant...that'd be good.
Regards
red