On Tue, 2022-10-18 at 09:37 -0400, pmkellly(a)frontier.com wrote:
>
> Second, since nobody really opposed the idea of extending the critpath
> definition slightly, here's a formal proposal to implement that. I want
> to edit the wiki critpath page:
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_path_package
>
> and change it as follows:
>
> 1. Under Background, change "The packages required to sustain these
> actions make up the critical path." to:
>
> "The packages required to sustain these actions initially made up the
> critical path. Later, it was agreed that the maintainers of Editions,
> spins, and labs can also declare packages that provide other key
> functionality to be part of the ''critical path'' for that Edition,
> spin or lab."
>
> 2. Under Actions, change the first two sentences to read:
>
> "Packages required to perform the most fundamental actions on a system
> are always considered part of the ''critical path''. Those actions
> include: "
>
> Does anyone object to these proposed changes? Thanks!
I think this is a great improvement over what we had.
So, I just realized I never actually made these changes! I've just done
so now:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_path_package&dif...
I also updated the information on how critpath is generated and how you
can view it, as that all changed as part of this too.
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw(a)fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net