Product: Fedora Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919666
Bug ID: 919666
Summary: Update Old links to Announce mailing list
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: bryan.sutherland(a)gmail.com
Description of problem:URL pointing to mailman "fedora-announce-list" points to
old location on RH server. Link needs to be updated to point to
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/announce
18.4. Subscribing to Fedora Announcements and News
To receive information about package updates, subscribe to either the
announcements mailing list, or
the RSS feeds.
Fedora Project announcements mailing list
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-announce-list
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Read section 18.1 of Install Guide
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Should be linked to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/announce
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857583
Bug ID: 857583
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: devel
Priority: unspecified
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Assignee: rlandman(a)redhat.com
Summary: Typo - Page pertaining to Fedora 17 has links to
Fedora 16
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Linux
Reporter: kellybellis(a)gwi.net
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: i686
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: installation-quick-start-guide
Product: Fedora Documentation
Description of problem: URL looks like it might need attention
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 17 Live CD
Image File
How reproducible: typo - seems so at any rate
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info: at
page:http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Installation_Quick_…
Link is to The image file for the Fedora 17 live CD is available from
http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/16/Live/i686/Fe….
Shouldn't this be 17 instead of 16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857729
Bug ID: 857729
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Severity: high
Version: devel
Priority: unspecified
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Assignee: rlandman(a)redhat.com
Summary: Build errors out due to missing
Package_Selection-dvd.xml file.
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: joat(a)757.org
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: installation-quick-start-guide
Product: Fedora Documentation
Description of problem:
Publican issues the following error when trying to build the Installation Quick
Start Guide:
FATAL ERROR: XInclude:1604 in Installation_Quick_Start_Guide.xml on line 37:
could not load Package_Selection-dvd.xml, and no fallback was found
Verified that Package_Selection-dvd.xml does not exist in en-US/.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible: consistent
Steps to Reproduce:
1. mkdir projects
2. cd projects
3. git clone
git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/docs/installation-quick-start-guide.git
4. cd installation-quick-start-guide
5. publican build --langs=en-US --formats=html
Same error is emitted for --formats=pdf
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976101
Bug ID: 976101
Summary: typo in Security Guide 3.9.3 - should be /sbin/service
iptables
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: security-guide
Severity: low
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com
Reporter: bugredhat(a)halfgoat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com,
security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
typo in Security Guide section 3.9.3 - incorrect in final Note "(/sbin/iptables
service)" should be "(/sbin/service iptables)"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 18
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Read section 3.9.3
2.
3.
Actual results:
(/sbin/iptables service)
Expected results:
(/sbin/service iptables)
Additional info:
It is correct elsewhere on the page.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836383
Bug ID: 836383
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Severity: high
Version: devel
Priority: unspecified
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Assignee: rlandman(a)redhat.com
Summary: Merging teams and… zanata or TXN?!
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: installation-quick-start-guide
Product: Fedora Documentation
Hi,
I am a maintainer of this guide at TXN, but before doing the full merge, i
wanted to be sure…
https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/fedora-ins-quick-start-guide/
* fb03c3c Adding zanata config file
I can see some zanata things.
You serious guys, you are moving to zanata?
If so…
* Please *MERGE* before.
* Also, be notified that you won't benefit of any Fedora translators. Only RH
folks are there… That's not good, we use a unified platform, already spreading
translators between teams… having many platform is going to be a pain.
* delete the transifex one. And prevent us, translators…
If the project stay at TXN, why it does not have any .tx/config file? (or no
lang_map?)
Could I help?
Thanks,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970468
Bug ID: 970468
Summary: Inconsistent expression in Development section of
Fedora 19 release notes
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: tiansworld(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Description of problem:
Under Development section,
There is a paragraph:
Python programmers who use the xml ...
<package>PyXML</package> replaced the <function>stdlib</function> code with its
own ... code and unmaintained upstream.
I think what the sentence "<package>PyXML</package> replaced the
<function>stdlib</function> code with its own" expressing is wrong and
inconsistent with previous statement.
<package>PyXML</package> is replaced, not <function>stdlib</function>.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 19 beta
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
It should be changed.
For example, change it to:
<function>stdlib</function> replaced the <package>PyXML</package> code with its
own.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972458
Bug ID: 972458
Summary: kickstart ks= kernel command line options are
documented incorrectly
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jreed(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jlayton(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreed(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Table 11.2 on this page seems to have the wrong syntax listed for ks= options:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Installation_Guide/sn-au…
It says:
ks=hd:/device/directory/ks.cfg
...but really, it should be:
ks=hd:device:/directory/ks.cfg
...I think the others are similarly incorrect, but don't have a good way to
confirm that at the moment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977771
Bug ID: 977771
Summary: System_Daemons: Should "/var/run/journal is volatile"
be in the past tense?
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Description of problem:
In the following sentence:
"In previous releases, journal data was stored in
<filename>/var/run/journal</filename>, which is volatile and cleared on
reboot."
Should "which is volatile..." be written in the past tense? Does it mean "which
was volatile..."?
I'm sorry if I misunderstand the sentence.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
F19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973800
Bug ID: 973800
Summary: PXE boot: GRUB splash.xpm.gz no longer exists
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: jreed(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreed(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Installation_Guide/s1-ne…
cp /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz /var/lib/tftpboot/pxelinux/splash.xpm.gz
Fedora 18 x86_64 no longer has /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz .
GRUB2 does not seems to have such file.
(I do not yet know if it matters to omit this file.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973173
Bug ID: 973173
Summary: Typo in Desktop.xml for F19
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Created attachment 759599
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=759599&action=edit
Fix typo
Description of problem:
Desktop.xml for F19 has a typo. Look at the following diff (the patch is
attached):
diff --git a/en-US/Desktop.xml b/en-US/Desktop.xml
index 9bd23e1..99bf5d7 100644
--- a/en-US/Desktop.xml
+++ b/en-US/Desktop.xml
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
The latest release of the popular desktop environment
<productname>Cinnamon</productname> brings new features and polish to Fedora
&PRODVER;, including:
<simplelist>
<member>
- <emphasis>nemo</emphasis>, the file manager, has been heavily
modified to itegrate it's behavior with Cinnamon.
+ <emphasis>nemo</emphasis>, the file manager, has been heavily
modified to itegrate its behavior with Cinnamon.
</member>
<member>
<emphasis>screensaver</emphasis> has been improved, including a lock
screen with customizable away message.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.