docs-qa June 2013

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
57 discussions

[Bug 977062] New: Guide should document Offline Updates
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jul '13

09 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977062 Bug ID: 977062 Summary: Guide should document Offline Updates Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com For users of GNOME in Fedora, PackageKit now applies updates in an special update target [1]. We should cover this feature in the System Administrator's guide, possibly in the PackageKit section. [1]http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/OfflineSystemUpdates -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 965612] New: New Bugzilla component for Fedora Virtualization Deployment and Administration Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965612 Bug ID: 965612 Summary: New Bugzilla component for Fedora Virtualization Deployment and Administration Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: lnovich(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Document URL: Section Number and Name: Describe the issue: Suggestions for improvement: Additional information: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 947458] New: Duplicate sentence
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947458 Bug ID: 947458 Summary: Duplicate sentence Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: user-guide Severity: low Priority: unspecified Assignee: fnadge(a)redhat.com Reporter: Geodebay(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: danielsmw(a)gmail.com, jmbabich(a)gmail.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, rlandman(a)redhat.com Category: --- Description of problem: In the file Tour_of_the_GNOME_desktop.xml, the same sentence (pretty much the same) is duplicated line #11 and line #17. You may suppress the first. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 956280] New: Some typos
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956280 Bug ID: 956280 Summary: Some typos Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: user-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: dhensley(a)redhat.com Reporter: Geodebay(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: danielsmw(a)gmail.com, jmbabich(a)gmail.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, rlandman(a)redhat.com Category: --- Description of problem: Media.xml: line 8 typo "enviroments" > "environments" line 45 typo "burn and Audio CD" > "burn an Audio CD" typo "plus icon to add open" > "plus icon to open" line 56 wording "...from the Gnome Live CD or the DVD." > "...from the Live CD or the DVD." line 243 Docbook tag missing su -c 'livecd-iso-to-disk the_image.iso /dev/<replaceable>sdX1</replaceable>' > su -c 'livecd-iso-to-disk <replaceable>the_image.iso</replaceable> /dev/<replaceable>sdX1</replaceable>' Accessing_the_Web.xml line 269 Docbook error <replaceable>scp</replaceable> scp is not replaceable. Communications.xml line 257 error "cannot find the Application Data >> "cannot find the AppData folder</title>" line 259 error "..cannot find the <filename>Application Data</filename> folder.." >> "...cannot find the <filename>AppData</filename> folder..." line 332 you must cut <menuchoice><guimenu>Edit</guimenu><guisubmenu>Select All</guisubmenu><guisubmenu>Edit</guisubmenu><guisubmenu>Copy</guisubmenu></menuchoice> >> <menuchoice><guimenu>Edit</guimenu><guisubmenu>Select All</guisubmenu></menuchoice> and <menuchoice><guisubmenu>Edit</guisubmenu><guisubmenu>Copy</guisubmenu></menuchoice> line 947 typo "button to ad your choice." >> "button to add your choice." Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): draft How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 977756] New: Desktop: KDE section is inside GNOME section
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977756 Bug ID: 977756 Summary: Desktop: KDE section is inside GNOME section Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Description of problem: The KDE section is put inside the GNOME section. You need to put it out of the GNOME section. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F19 Additional info: A patch is coming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 978066] New: Request to publish French translation of F19 Release Notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '13

28 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978066 Bug ID: 978066 Summary: Request to publish French translation of F19 Release Notes Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jfenal(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Description of problem: French translations of the Release Notes are not yet published on docs.fp.org, while translation is at 100%, and proofreading near completion. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 977413] New: named: "PID file has been moved to /run/named/named.pid" should be documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jun '13

26 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977413 Bug ID: 977413 Summary: named: "PID file has been moved to /run/named/named.pid" should be documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: high Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: thozza(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Description of problem: Since F19 the named PID file has been moved from default location (/var/run/named/named.pid) to new location (/run/named/named.pid). If someone is using custom named.conf based on older Fedora (before F19), then they need to add a pid-file statement into options section to point to the new PID file location. options { ... pid-file "/run/named/named.pid"; ... }; Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 19 Actual results: No documentation. Expected results: Release note informing about this change or it should be somewhere documented. Additional info: There is already F19 Bug #977191 cased by not informed user. Sorry for the late Bug. The change was made by previous maintainer and I'm not aware of any existing note warning about this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 977762] New: Desktop: Is ">UID" a typo?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jun '13

26 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977762 Bug ID: 977762 Summary: Desktop: Is ">UID" a typo? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jmatsuzawa(a)gnome.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Description of problem: I'm not sure about this, but in "To view your user session log, identify your user ID and view the journal for that <systemitem>>UID</systemitem> :" in the GNOME section, does "<systemitem>>UID</systemitem>" mean "<systemitem>UID</systemitem>" or "<systemitem>_UID</systemitem>"? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 977688] New: Fedora 19 release notes: Circuit Design contains old strings which prevent the translation been published
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jun '13

25 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977688 Bug ID: 977688 Summary: Fedora 19 release notes: Circuit Design contains old strings which prevent the translation been published Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: low Priority: unspecified Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: tiansworld(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net Description of problem: Pete Travis made a test build here: http://fedorapeople.org/groups/docs/release-notes/ I found that Circuit Design section in all the available translations are published with original English. But the PO files are translated in transifex. And PO file has more strings than the published one. They are from Fedora 17. The published Fedora 19 Circuit Design section has: 5.2.1. gtkwave 5.2.2. XCircuit But PO file has: gerbv,pcb,kicad and so on. How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: PO file are translated in transifex, then the translation should be available. Old string should be removed from Fedora 19 PO file. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 977050] New: Setting [repository] Options section should document 'includepkgs', 'exclude' options
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jun '13

22 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977050 Bug ID: 977050 Summary: Setting [repository] Options section should document 'includepkgs', 'exclude' options Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com When using multiple repositories, it is often useful to blacklist problematic packages, or to whitelist packages to be allowed from a particular repo. This functionality is provided by the 'includepkgs' and 'exclude' options within a repository directive. For example, one could whitelist packages from updates-testing that they use regularly and want to participating testing for, without bringing all testing packages in when updating. I think it would be helpful to users to document these features in section 4.3.2. Setting [repository] Options . --Pete -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa June 2013