On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 10:44, Troy Dawson tdawson@redhat.com wrote:
It was a configuration mix up that pulled in ALL the modules instead of just the default ones. It only lasted a week (I think) and has been fixed. It was just bad timing, nothing you could have done to prevent, or fix it.
I thought we'd caught all the packages that were built that might have been affected, but I guess we didn't catch them all.
It lasted for 72 hours, and I missed the ImageMagick needing a rebuild.
Troy
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 7:26 AM Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 09:34 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
V Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 12:29:06AM +0100, Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
On Sat, 2022-06-11 at 17:25 +0000, bugzilla@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, for some reason the build on epel 8 to update ImageMagick-6.9.12 from 48 to 50 ( https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1972114 ) used perl-libs-4:5.32.1-471.module+el8.6.0+13324+628a2397 from I guess modules repo
Interesting. I'm courious how it could happen. DNF rejects installing modular packages if they are not listed in a defintion of a module stream. So either somebody enabled perl:5.32 stream explicitly (improbable), or mock repositories in Koji are configured with module_hotfixes=true which is alarming.
"Koji are configured with module_hotfixes=true" , but usually don't push perl:5.32 stream , why this time it was pushed ? how I can avoid it ?
Thank you
Koji configuration confirm the other theory:
$ koji mock-config -a x86_64 --target epel8-candidate | grep module_hotfixes config_opts['yum.conf'] = '[main]\ncachedir=/var/cache/yum\ndebuglevel=1\nlogfile=/var/log/yum. log\nreposdir=/dev/null\nretries=20\nobsoletes=1\ngpgcheck=0\nassumey es=1\nkeepcache=1\ninstall_weak_deps=0\nstrict=1\n\n# repos\n\n[build]\nname=build\nbaseurl= https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/epel8- build/4655904/x86_64\nmodule_hotfixes=1\n'
I recommend Koji maintainers to add and use RHEL repositories next to epel8-build with EPEL8 packages:
[build] name=build baseurl= https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/epel8-build/4655904/x86_64
[rhel-AppStream] name=rhel-AppStream baseurl=WHEREVER_FEDORA_TAKES_RHEL8_PACKAGES_FROM
-- Petr
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject...
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
-- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject... Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject... Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure