Hi. It seems like since some of us are on different sides of the worlds perhaps we should on every Wednesday, have meeting times set at Greg's original proposed time, 14:00 GMT, and then again at 20:00 GMT?
What do you think? Send back a reply.
I think this would give all of us a 'Time to meet' at the least also open up an avenue for people wanting to attend but may not make it to one, or another. Is this redundant, is it going to create too much out-of-sync'ness? Surely not if both meeting notes are posted somewhere, by someone.
J. Hartline
J. Hartline wrote:
It seems like since some of us are on different sides of the worlds perhaps we should on every Wednesday, have meeting times set at Greg's original proposed time, 14:00 GMT, and then again at 20:00 GMT?
What do you think? Send back a reply.
So long as the logs are posted from one meeting to the next, the problem is that the 20:00 merting is relatively soon after the 14:00 meeting so it can pick up points, but the next 14:00 meeting will always be nearly a week after the preceeding 20:00 meeting, so it might make the flow a bit difficult.
I think this would give all of us a 'Time to meet' at the least also open up an avenue for people wanting to attend but may not make it to one, or another. Is this redundant, is it going to create too much out-of-sync'ness? Surely not if both meeting notes are posted somewhere, by someone.
I kept a log last night, and chitlesh posted it to the wiki, but it got a bit munged there, so I tried to repost it here, but it's too big and awaits moderator approval, I can send it direct if you'd like?
Andy Burns wrote:
So long as the logs are posted from one meeting to the next, the problem is that the 20:00 merting is relatively soon after the 14:00 meeting so it can pick up points, but the next 14:00 meeting will always be nearly a week after the preceeding 20:00 meeting, so it might make the flow a bit difficult.
Well, 14:00 GMT is about 8AM CST, the 20:00 proposed time was to cater for those in Europe, perhaps still at work at the time. Is there a better time schedule you can think of, keeping the original 14:00 GMT as suggested by Greg?
I kept a log last night, and chitlesh posted it to the wiki, but it got a bit munged there, so I tried to repost it here, but it's too big and awaits moderator approval, I can send it direct if you'd like?
Well, post it for all of us!
J. Hartline
Concerning meetings time, we can alternate. Meaning one week at 1400 GMT the other week it will be at 2000GMT just like the ambassadors meeting :)
Well, post it for all of us!
I did send a mail to the list ? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-livecd-list/2006-February/msg00002.ht...
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
I did send a mail to the list ? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-livecd-list/2006-February/msg00002.ht...
you did, but when I first tried the link on the wiki it had turned it from a "html" file into a ".bin" file
Direct link to avoid having to follow three clicks through the wiki to get to it ...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kadischi/Meetings?action=AttachFile&do=get...
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 18:25 +0000, Andy Burns wrote:
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
I did send a mail to the list ? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-livecd-list/2006-February/msg00002.ht...
you did, but when I first tried the link on the wiki it had turned it from a "html" file into a ".bin" file
Yeah -- seems the wiki needs the .html extension on attachments in order to send the correct mime/type to the browser. It was the only change I needed to make to get the attachment to display nicely.
-Toshio
Yeah -- seems the wiki needs the .html extension on attachments in order to send the correct mime/type to the browser. It was the only change I needed to make to get the attachment to display nicely.
-Toshio
Thanks Toshio, Ill try this to come up with a template for the meeting minutes/transcript so that it looks better :)
livecd@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Andy Burns -
Chitlesh GOORAH -
J. Hartline -
Toshio Kuratomi