license of the binary policy
by Jilayne Lovejoy
Hi Fedora legal and packaging,
I'm cross-posting this, as I think it's relevant to both groups.
The current policy for filling out the license field of the spec file
(as described at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidel...
) states, "The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of
the binary rpm. When in doubt, ask."
As we consider how to improve documentation related to Fedora licensing,
it would be helpful to hear people's thoughts on the following:
1) how do you (package maintainers) interpret this policy in practice?
2) what further information/documentation about this policy would be
helpful?
3) should this policy be different, and if so, how?
4) any other related thoughts or observations
Thanks!
Jilayne
1 month, 3 weeks
- 12
- 39
Call for Participation: PackagingCon, October 26-28, Berlin & Virtual
by Dave Clements
PackagingCon 2023 <https://packaging-con.org/>
26-28th October
Berlin and online
*Submission deadline: 31st July*
Early registration ends: 8th September
PackagingCon 2023 <https://packaging-con.org/> will bring together
different software packaging ecosystems to share best practices and discuss
common challenges in software packaging. From Python’s pip to Rust’s cargo
to Julia’s Pkg, from DNF to Nix to conda and mamba, and from vcpkg to
Spack. The 2021 conference drew 350+ participants and featured over 60
presentations <https://www.youtube.com/@packagingcon9302/videos>.
Call for Submissions
This conference is for developers of software package management tools, as
well as software packagers and communities. Package management helps tame
software complexity and establish and maintain software supply chain
security. This is a challenging domain that embraces a diverse set of
solutions. If you work in software package management then please share
your work <https://cfp.packaging-con.org/2023/cfp> at PackagingCon! The
call for submissions closes 31st July. Topics from the most focused
technical questions to community engagement isare welcome.
Register Now
Early registration <https://ti.to/packagingcon/packagingcon-2023> starts at
€37.50 for virtual, and €150 for in person. Significant discounts are
available for early registration, students, and those paying out of their
own funds. Early registration ends 8th September.
Seeking Conference Sponsors
PackagingCon 2023 <https://packaging-con.org/> is a rare opportunity for
your organization to support and reach the core decision makers and power
users of software packaging across all languages and operating
systems. Multiple
sponsorship levels are available
<https://packaging-con.org/s/sponsorship_prospectus_packagingcon_2023.pdf>
to suit your budget and goals. Please join sponsors such as Quansight
<https://quansight.com/> and Anaconda <https://www.anaconda.com/> to help
make PackagingCon 2023 possible and affordable.
We hope to see you in October, and your presentation proposals
<https://cfp.packaging-con.org/2023/cfp> this month,
Dave Clements
on behalf of the PackagingCon 2023 Organizing Committee
8 months, 2 weeks
- 1
- 2
Restore access to torrent-file-editor package
by Ivan Romanov
Hello I'm maintainer of torrent-file-editor package in
Fedora and author of torrent-file-editor application. My FAS is
ivanromanov. Some weeks ago I updated app and wanted to update my
package in Fedora but can't do this. Seems now I haven't access to my
package. I opened package on
https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/torrent-file-editor/torrent-file-...
seems now maintainer somebody jonathanspw. I tried to send message to
torrent-file-editor dash maintainers at fedoraproject dot org but
didn't get any response. So how to restore access to my package in this
case?
10 months
- 1
- 0
- ← Newer
- 1
- Older →