test May 2005

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

305 participants
459 discussions

reason to upgrade to test 3 for minimal?
by Steven Morehouse 10 May '05

10 May '05

Hi. I have test 2 running after doing a minimal install. Has anything relevant to a minimal install changed for test 3? Everything I'm using FC4 for seems to be solid in test 2. I'm new to this - where can I see a comprehensive list of changes? The summary only lists a few things but there had to have been more changes to that. Any kernel upgrade? Steve

3 2

Re: Minimal install
by Steven Morehouse 10 May '05

10 May '05

that was test 2 - I haven't tried test 3 yet. Steve ----- Original Message ----- Subject: Re: Minimal install Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 14:02:08 -0400 From: Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> Steven Morehouse (morehouse(a)telus.net) said: > Why does the minimal install require 2 cds? The ONLY package it grabs from the 2nd cd is openoffice.org, which certainly is NOT required for a minimal install. Test 2 or test 3? Bill -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

2 1

Minimal install
by Steven Morehouse 10 May '05

10 May '05

Why does the minimal install require 2 cds? The ONLY package it grabs from the 2nd cd is openoffice.org, which certainly is NOT required for a minimal install.

2 1

Problems Load balance network - FC4t2
by aadm＠brturbo.com.br 10 May '05

10 May '05

1 0

FC4 T3 already out ?
by hubes hubes 10 May '05

10 May '05

Hi, I've notices this on one of the mirrors. http://mirrors.xmission.com/fedora/core/test/3.92/i386/iso/ containgen and downlodable FC4-test3-i386-disc1.iso 05-May-2005 19:11 634M but test 3 should'nt be avalible yet ? some last minute fixes where to be made afaik. /hubes 10 Gigabyte Mailbox - http://mail.spray.se/?targetcode=se_footer

3 2

Re: Re: FC4 T3 already out ?
by hubes hubes 10 May '05

10 May '05

Yah around now (1400 UCT) /hubes > Från: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday(a)mindspring.com> > Till: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com> > Rubrik: Re: FC4 T3 already out ? > Datum: Tue, 10 May 2005 09:54:14 -0400 (EDT) > On Tue, 10 May 2005, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:39:41PM +0000, hubes hubes wrote: > > > <a href=http://mirrors.xmission.com/fedora/core/test/3.92/i386/iso/>http://mirrors.xmission.com/fedora/core/test/3.92/i386/iso/</a>> [... > > > but test 3 should'nt be avalible yet ? some last minute fixes > > > where to be made afaik. > > > > They probably flipped the permission bits too early by accident. > > the schedule *does* say may 10. > > rday > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list(a)redhat.com > To unsubscribe: > <a href=http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list</a> 10 Gigabyte Mailbox - http://mail.spray.se/?targetcode=se_footer

1 0

Re: FC4 T3 already out ?
by Matthew Miller 10 May '05

10 May '05

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:39:41PM +0000, hubes hubes wrote: > http://mirrors.xmission.com/fedora/core/test/3.92/i386/iso/ [... > but test 3 should'nt be avalible yet ? some last minute fixes where to be made afaik. They probably flipped the permission bits too early by accident. -- Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 78 degrees Fahrenheit.

2 1

Kernel .1286
by Roger Grosswiler 10 May '05

10 May '05

Hi, After installing the last Kernel, i get refused the login in runlevel 5. May 7 10:59:03 neo gdm[2932]: session_child_run: /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession default could not be executed Roger

3 3

Nvidia Dance...
by Charles Lesh 10 May '05

10 May '05

Hey all: I've been happily using FC3 with binary nvidia drivers for a while. I've also been playing with rawhide, which is sweet, but a no go with binary nvidia drivers. If I remember correctly, FC3 test releases and the initial release itself could not handle the binary nvidia drivers due to changes in the kernel. Without flames, and understanding how evil binary drivers are, should I expect a significant delay and lots of screwing around between the release of FC4 and the nvidia drivers working? (I like to call this the nvidia dance.) I wish I didn't need the binary driver, but I have a laptop, and have found no other way to drive a second monitor ('twinview"), which I need to do when I give presentations. Sadly, this why windows is still on one of my partitions. -cjl

5 4

Problems with Xen (kernel-xen0-2.6.11-1.1226_FC4) and Intel Corporation 82562ET/EZ/GT/GZ Ethernet
by Keith Sharp 10 May '05

10 May '05

Hello, I have been trying to get Xen working with the most recent kernel builds from Rawhide. When I boot using Xen and kernel-xen0 the network fails and I get tracebacks on the console. Booting starts as expected but starting eth0 seems to take a little longer than normal. The problems begin when NTP is started, booting pauses here for quite a few seconds and then a traceback appears. Booting eventually continues with these pauses and tracebacks. When the system is finally up I can login is root and the network appears to be up (according to ifconfig) but I cannot ping any other local devices and the RX and TX values for eth0 remain at zero. Attached is a console log from booting - the interesting stuff is towards the end, the output of lspci, and my grub.conf I am running FC4T1 with kernel and xen updated from Rawhide: kernel-xen0-2.6.11-1.1226_FC4 kernel-smp-2.6.11-1.1226_FC4 kernel-2.6.11-1.1226_FC4 kernel-xenU-2.6.11-1.1226_FC4 The Ethernet port works fine under the standard SMP kernel. Is anyone else seeing this? Keith.

2 1

← Newer
1
...
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
...
46
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test May 2005