docs-qa December 2013

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
180 discussions

[Bug 1021203] New: PDF version of Installation Guide misformatted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021203 Bug ID: 1021203 Summary: PDF version of Installation Guide misformatted Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: ruslan.khafizov(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: PDF version of Installation Guide looks unusual. Margins are huge and take 2/3 of page width. Font is quite small and barely readable. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 19 How reproducible: Download document from http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/pdf/Installation_Guide/Fedora… Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/pdf/Installation_Guide/Fedora… 2. See. Actual results: pdf document which is hard to read Expected results: pdf document which can be read and printed. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 995886] New: kickstart "repo" suboptions incomplete
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995886 Bug ID: 995886 Summary: kickstart "repo" suboptions incomplete Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: stephent98(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Description of problem: For the kickstart "repo" option, the F19 Installation Guide lists three suboptions: repo --name=<repoid> [--baseurl=<url>| --mirrorlist=<url>] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/s1-ki… The Anaconda/Kickstart wiki lists nine suboptions: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart#repo repo --name=<name> [--baseurl=<url>|--mirrorlist=<url>] [options] --name= --baseurl= --mirrorlist= --cost= --excludepkgs= --includepkgs= --proxy=[protocol://][username[:password]@]host[:port] --ignoregroups=true --noverifyssl Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F19 Installation Guide http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/s1-ki… Anaconda/Kickstart wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart#repo Additional info: Bug 995526 - regression: --cost ignored in kickstart file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1036643] New: Example 3.1 appears to mix references to 32- and 64-bit install DVD isos
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036643 Bug ID: 1036643 Summary: Example 3.1 appears to mix references to 32- and 64-bit install DVD isos Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: rpjday(a)crashcourse.ca QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co In Example 3.1 in the current install guide, the mount command refers to a 64-bit version of the ISO, but the final call to "livecd-iso-to-disk" refers to a 32-bit version of the ISO. Is this deliberate? It seems potentially confusing. rday -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 991093] New: Innacurate information about deleting data in 12. Storage and partitioning
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991093 Bug ID: 991093 Summary: Innacurate information about deleting data in 12. Storage and partitioning Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Below is a copypaste of two e-mails from docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org explaining the issue. ================================================================================ Mail 1 from Adam Williamson: Someone on the forums kindly pointed out an inaccuracy in the Installation Guide: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Quick_Star… "All data will be erased during installation from the disks you select at this stage. Do not select disks that contain data you want to preserve." This is not correct. It would be correct to say that no data can *possibly* be deleted from any disks you *don't* select at this stage, but it is not true that all data will be removed from disks you *do* select. Suggesting that this is the case prevents people from following lots of common install paths. What actually happens to the data on the selected disks depends on the user's choices at Installation Options and 'custom partitioning' or Reclaim Space. If you go to custom partitioning, basically, you're in complete control of what happens; you can do all sorts of stuff from there, but no data/partitions will be lost unless you explicitly choose for that to happen. If the disk has sufficient unpartitioned space and you just pick the easiest 'install into empty space' path, no existing data will be disturbed, though any existing bootloader in the MBR will be overwritten (this is normal and has always been the case). If you go through Reclaim Space, you get the choice of what existing partitions to delete or resize. ===================================================================== Mail 2 from Chris Murphy: Yeah, the user actually needs to go to some extreme lengths to erase all data on the selected disk. In Custom, it's deleted one partition at a time, with an optional shortcut that popsup offering to delete all related partitions (which still may not be all data on disk). Further, a summary pops up and shows what will be deleted in red text. In Guided, user either must set each partition to be deleted, or click on the disk (make model number) and set it to delete which then shows all partitions being set to delete as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982656] New: A couple of suggestions for 9.17. Installation Complete
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982656 Bug ID: 982656 Summary: A couple of suggestions for 9.17. Installation Complete Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Keywords: Documentation Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pkovar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Hey Petr, Just a couple of suggestions for section 9.17. Installation Complete "Now that you have configured the remaining settings, your Fedora installation is now complete!" --> "Now that you have configured the remaining settings, your Fedora installation is complete." "9.17.1. Initial Setup in GNOME" --> GNOME Initial Setup "haven't" --> "have not" "The Initial Setup application is only available for GNOME." This might need some rewording since we now have two initial setup apps in Fedora (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NewFirstboot, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/InitialExperience) that do almost the same thing, but target different DEs. "create an user account" --> "create a user account" "After you are finished configuring" --> "After you have finished configuring" "On the first login, the Gnome Help application will automatically open" The application is called Yelp, not Gnome Help. However, you probably just want to mention that "GNOME Help will automatically open...". "Figure 9.40. Language selection in Gnome Initial Setup" --> "Language selection in GNOME Initial Setup" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 904083] New: Storage Administration Guide is obsolete or not?
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Jul '14

24 Jul '14

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904083 Bug ID: 904083 Summary: Storage Administration Guide is obsolete or not? Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: storage-administration-guide Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: q2dg(a)yahoo.es I've seen in http://docs.fedoraproject.org that last version of "Storage Administration Guide" is for Fedora 14. It's more than two years ago!! I don't know if this fact is due to this guide doesn't need any update or if it's due to a lack of love from editors. I want to notify this in Bugzilla to remember this situation, but I'm not sure it is really a bug... Could you tell me the reason of this abandonment? Thanks!! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1010674] New: kdeaccessibility
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '14

28 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010674 Bug ID: 1010674 Summary: kdeaccessibility Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: accessibility-guide Assignee: gerard(a)ryan.lt Reporter: cickumqt(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: gerard(a)ryan.lt, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Hi, In transifex: "In Fedora, <application>KMouseTool</application> is packaged in the <package>kdeaccessibility</package> package. This package also contains kmagnifier, kmouth, and ktts, all of which are discussed in other areas of this guide. To install <package>kdeaccessibility</package> you can either select <menuchoice><guilabel>System > Administration > Add/Remove Software</guilabel></menuchoice> and then type in <package>kdeaccessibility</package> in the screen that pops up, or in a terminal window type su -c "yum install kdeaccessibility"." I just searched and found kmousetool has been packaged as standalone package from f20, should we revise the doc? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 995128] New: Add a UEFI not compatible arch (i686)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995128 Bug ID: 995128 Summary: Add a UEFI not compatible arch (i686) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: kraymond(a)shaiton.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com Please add that the i686 releases are not UEFI compatible on the following section: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Installation_Guide/ch-ne… This is the one we use to choose the arch, that's where it should fit, more than in table 3.1 (Boot and installation media) or Chap 7 (Booting the Installer). Related to BZ#994854 Thanks, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1043292] New: simple typos
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043292 Bug ID: 1043292 Summary: simple typos Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-burning-isos Assignee: zach(a)oglesby.co Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Few typos found in some of the guide chapters/files: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 20 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: 1. File: Making_USB_Media Line 281 (last para): Use this method for the distribution image, the minimal boot media image, or on systems with a UNIX operating system (including Mac OX X). Incorrect name of the Apple operating system. 2. File: Making_Minimal_Boot_Media Line 27 (5th para, 3rd item/indent of the list Use minimal boot media): to use a kickstart file during installation (refer to <xref linkend="s2-kickstart2-boot-media"/> The ending round bracket/parenthesis is missing. 3. File: Procedure_dd_Image_to_USB Line 22 (3rd para, preceding the output of dmesg command): ...The output will identify the <systemitem>device node</systemitem> of the drive, in this case <literal>/dev/sdc</literal>: The actual output however contains sdd (inconsistency). Expected results: 1. Should be Mac OS X 2. The ending round bracket/parenthesis should be added 3. The device name should be changed to /dev/sdd Additional info: Just noticed, while doing the translation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982517] New: 4.4.1. Adding a New User
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982517 Bug ID: 982517 Summary: 4.4.1. Adding a New User Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 4.4.1 at item number 6 explaining the user creation process, it is inferred that the contents of /etc/skel are as follows: . .. .bash_logout .bash_profile .bashrc .gnome2 .mozilla They are in fact: . .. .bash_logout .bash_profile .bashrc .mozilla .zshrc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
18
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa December 2013