docs-qa December 2013

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
180 discussions

[Bug 1021151] New: X2Go
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021151 Bug ID: 1021151 Summary: X2Go Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: cickumqt(a)gmail.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, orion(a)cora.nwra.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998551, 969209, 969212, 969220, 990815, 990817, 991286, 991292, 1004094 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998551 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: X2Go For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/X2Go The X2Go project has taken over development of the old NX libraries and has developed new clients and server code around it. We will move to use the X2Go NX library in Fedora and include the full X2Go suite. --- Additional comment from Orion Poplawski on 2013-08-22 11:20:42 EDT --- Review of main nx-libs component is stalled. --- Additional comment from Orion Poplawski on 2013-08-31 00:11:58 EDT --- We seem to be making progress again. Current issues: - nx-libs should be approved soon - x2goclient is blocking on a bundled library exception - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/343 - remmina-plugins-nx and qtnx will need to require nxproxy - freenx-server will need to require nxagent As a proven packager I can make the above two changes once nx-libs is imported. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:44:45 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-14 10:28:01 EDT --- Orion, I can see all tracker bugs closed. Does this mean this Change is completed now and could be moved to ON_QA? --- Additional comment from Orion Poplawski on 2013-10-14 15:05:26 EDT --- yes, I think so. ============================= Tracking bug for inclusion in Release Notes Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969209 [Bug 969209] Review Request: nx-libs - NX X11 protocol compression libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969212 [Bug 969212] Review Request: x2goclient - Graphical client for use with the X2Go network based computing environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969220 [Bug 969220] Review Request: x2goserver - Server for use with the X2Go network based computing environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990815 [Bug 990815] Review Request: x2godesktopsharing - Share X2go desktops with other users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990817 [Bug 990817] Review Request: python-x2go - Python module providing X2Go client API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991286 [Bug 991286] Review Request: pyhoca-gui - Graphical X2Go client written in (wx)Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991292 [Bug 991292] Review Request: pyhoca-cli - Command line X2Go client written in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998551 [Bug 998551] X2Go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004094 [Bug 1004094] Review Request: cups-x2go - CUPS backend for printing from X2Go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1008196] New: GLIBC 2.18
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '13

18 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008196 Bug ID: 1008196 Summary: GLIBC 2.18 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: codonell(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 999952 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #999952 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: GLIBC 2.18 For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/GLIBC218 Switch GLIBC in Fedora 20 to GLIBC version 2.18 -------------------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/184937.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1021133] New: docs-check: Shared Certificate Tools
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '13

18 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021133 Bug ID: 1021133 Summary: docs-check: Shared Certificate Tools Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stefw(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998546 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998546 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Shared Certificate Tools For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/SharedCertificateTools Fedora now has infrastructure for sharing system trusted certificates between the various crypto libraries. --- Additional comment from Stef Walter on 2013-08-29 08:32:51 EDT --- Substantiably testable using p11-kit-0.19.4 which is in Fedora 20. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:13 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule =========================== Docs Task: Identify documentation that is impacted by this change and open bugs as required. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998546 [Bug 998546] Shared Certificate Tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1044359] New: [F21 Release Notes] Split of bind-chroot subpackage should be documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Dec '13

18 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044359 Bug ID: 1044359 Summary: [F21 Release Notes] Split of bind-chroot subpackage should be documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: thozza(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The 'bind-chroot' sub-package of bind has been split into two separate sub-packages: - bind-chroot (for running named in a chroot) - bind-sdb-chroot (for running named-sdb in a chroot) This change should be documented to prevent possible surprises. For more information please see Doc Text in Bug #997030. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 987669] New: Fedora has no support or support limits
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '13

14 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987669 Bug ID: 987669 Summary: Fedora has no support or support limits Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com Created attachment 777472 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=777472&action=edit Comments out support limit section The section referencing RHEL/RHEV support limits does not apply to fedora users. The attached patch comments out this section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 987710] New: section "Guest CPU models" needs updating
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '13

14 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987710 Bug ID: 987710 Summary: section "Guest CPU models" needs updating Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com The section "Guest CPU models" should be updated, comments below: Background: - http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/CPUModels has the QEMU roadmap for relevant features - rawhide/F20 is currently shipping qemu-1.5.1 - F19 is currently shipping qemu-1.4.2 - F18 is currently shipping qemu-1.2.2 - Fedora ships qemu-kvm as /usr/bin/qemu-kvm not /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm The first part of the section states CPU configurations are defined in XML files rather than hardcoded; per the roadmap, they are again hardcoded to allow compatibility code and more unified processor definitions. There's no indication of backwards compatibility from qemu, although virsh and friends may still accept .conf definitions and Know What To Do when talking to qemu. In F18 and F19, `qemu-kvm -cpu ?cpuid` and `qemu-kvm -cpu ?dump` do not function. In F18, `qemu-kvm -cpu ?` gives a terse list of definitions. in F19, `qemu-kvm -cpu ?` gives a more descriptive list, and also includes a comprehensive list of recognized CPU flags. This could possibly replace `?cpuid` In both, `qemu-kvm -cpu <name>,enforce` functions as expected; this content is commented out. Looking further into comparing guest CPU features, I find `virsh capabilities` will generate xml representing the host. It also appears to represent other architectures that the host could emulate - if the appropriate packages (ie qemu-arm ) are installed, and I correctly understand what they do. There's also `virsh cpu-baseline` to generate a cpu definition that would allow migration between file-defined hosts, and `virsh cpu-compare` to compare a defined host with the local host. Both of these rely on [deprecated] xml .conf cpu definition files. I haven't been able to find a more elegant way to compare cpu configurations than scripting together the above virsh commands, presuming `virsh capabilities` works the way I suspect. The qemu roadmap cites `-cpu best` as a way to get the best CPU definition when creating a guest - but it doesn't work here, and I'm not sure how it would make a determination if it did. A lot of the information I've discovered deals directly with qemu, not libvirt. With qemu moving back to hard coded cpu definitions, I think it would be good to get some insight on if libvirt tools are affected and how they are handling the change. In general, I think it would be better to present libvirt commands rather than commands executing qemu directly. I'm not submitting a patch for this one because I'm not sure where to go with it. It *seems* like libvirt should have a simple way to compare the capabilities of heterogeneous hosts and aid in creating the best definitions for guests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 987674] New: KVM host verification is called KVM guest compatibility, and does not have a direct link
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '13

14 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987674 Bug ID: 987674 Summary: KVM host verification is called KVM guest compatibility, and does not have a direct link Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com Created attachment 777474 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=777474&action=edit Change title and add link The section "KVM guest virtual machine compatibility" refers to verifying that a machine is capable of acting as a KVM host, and references the Virtualization Administration Guide. The attach patch changes the title of that section to better reflect the content, and provides a direct link to the referenced content. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 987664] New: Guide intro references documnetnation that is not available for Fedora
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '13

14 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987664 Bug ID: 987664 Summary: Guide intro references documnetnation that is not available for Fedora Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com Created attachment 777453 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=777453&action=edit Patch commenting out unavailable guides. The introduction to the Virtualization Deployment and Administration Guide references related documentation that has been developed for RHEL/RHEV but is not maintained for Fedora. The attached patch comments out those sections so that only guides that are currently maintained for Fedora will be referenced. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1038510] New: After gromacs-4.6.3-2.fc19.i686 install still no package commands
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Dec '13

05 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038510 Bug ID: 1038510 Summary: After gromacs-4.6.3-2.fc19.i686 install still no package commands Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: defensive-coding-guide Assignee: fweimer(a)redhat.com Reporter: vytautas1987(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: fweimer(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com Description of problem: After gromacs-4.6.3-2.fc19.i686 install still no package commands Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): gromacs-4.6.3-2.fc19.i686 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install gromacs 2. mdrun -h 2b. trconnv -h ... Actual results: no commands Expected results: commands provided by package available Additional info: n/a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1035254] ssh client does not use primary ccache of a Kerberos ccache collection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Dec '13

03 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035254 Martin Kosek <mkosek(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dlackey(a)redhat.com Component|freeipa |freeipa-guide Version|19 |devel Depends On| |1034958 Assignee|rcritten(a)redhat.com |dlackey(a)redhat.com Product|Fedora |Fedora Documentation QA Contact|extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org |docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject | |.org --- Comment #6 from Martin Kosek <mkosek(a)redhat.com> --- I see no response, moving to documentation component myself. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034958 [Bug 1034958] RHEL7 IPA AD Trusted user ssh gssapi failed and user prompted for password -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa December 2013