docs-qa December 2013

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
180 discussions

[Bug 1044541] New: Consider making SELinux a REQUIREMENT, not recommendation.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jan '14

18 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044541 Bug ID: 1044541 Summary: Consider making SELinux a REQUIREMENT, not recommendation. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: mikelieman(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: While trying to upgrade, I ran into an apparent conflict between fedup and SELinux, which is disabled on this particular instance. Without finding it as a requirement, I reached out to the IRC channel #Fedora for assistance. Their response to my apparently supported use-case was vigorous, and let's just leave it at 'off-putting'. The take-away is that SELinux IS A DE-FACTO REQUIREMENT going forward, and the documentation should to corrected to reflect this REQUIREMENT. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F20 How reproducible: Unknown Steps to Reproduce: 1. Disable SELinux 2. Reach out to #Fedora on IRC for support Actual results: Offensive, Insulting Derision Expected results: Confirmation that yes, it is a de-facto requirement, and yes, the documentation should be updated to reflect it. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1036721] New: TX don't works with two different xml files with the same name in the publican tree
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036721 Bug ID: 1036721 Summary: TX don't works with two different xml files with the same name in the publican tree Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: security-guide Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com Reporter: Geodebay(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: In the files Publican tree : .... Contexts_and_Attributes.xml Targeted_Policy.xml <<<<<<<<<<<< Working_With_SELinux.xml Managing_Users.xml Troubleshooting.xml Further_Information.xml Managing_Confined_Services.xml Managing_Confined_Services/MCS_Introduction.xml Managing_Confined_Services/Targeted_Policy.xml <<<<<<<<<<< ... the file Targeted_Policy.xml is used twice. The files are not identical: the first in the list is well-stocked (29.9ko) by comparison with the second (22.3ko). The first seems newer. I don't know if duplication is necessary, but the duplication of two différent files with the same name arises problem of translation in Transiflex. Tx offers one file for translation: the second (the last in list?). So when you build the html with publican, many sentences are not translated. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1043298] New: Identical files in TX with different names
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043298 Bug ID: 1043298 Summary: Identical files in TX with different names Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: security-guide Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com Reporter: Geodebay(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: In TX, the content of the files "Introduction_managing_confined_services" and "MCS_Introduction " is identical (except datestamp). You may delete the first ("Introduction_managing_confined_services"). It is not used in the Publican tree (branch 19.1 of the GIT). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1046452] New: Error line 324 in PostgreSQL.xml
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046452 Bug ID: 1046452 Summary: Error line 324 in PostgreSQL.xml Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: security-guide Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com Reporter: Geodebay(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Line 324 Now that the <filename>/opt/postgresql</filename> location has been labeled with the correct context for PostgreSQL, the <systemitem class="daemon">mysqld</systemitem> service will start successfully: must be changed by: Now that the <filename>/opt/postgresql</filename> location has been labeled with the correct context for PostgreSQL, the <systemitem class="daemon">postgresql</systemitem> service will start successfully: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1001358] New: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x and greater
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001358 Bug ID: 1001358 Summary: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x and greater Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: a.badger(a)gmail.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, toshio(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998574 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998574 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x and greater For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Python_setuptools_0.7 Update to a new upstream release of python-setuptools that is not completely compatible with previous releases. The python-setuptools "major" version may be higher than 0.7.x as there's some other structural changes happening that should not affect API. --- Additional comment from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi on 2013-08-26 12:51:51 EDT --- Currently, no rawhide packages are known to be incompatible with the updated setuptools. Moving to MODIFIED. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-June/001159.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1008216] New: Adding NetworkManager Connections via CLI
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008216 Bug ID: 1008216 Summary: Adding NetworkManager Connections via CLI Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, psimerda(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, thaller(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998530 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998530 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Adding NetworkManager Connections via CLI For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NetworkManagerCLIAddConnection Support for adding new NetworkManager connections using the nmcli commandline tool. --- Additional comment from Thomas Haller on 2013-08-28 04:08:50 EDT --- I did some minor rephrasing on the Changes page. It should be ok as it is now. ------------------------------------------------------------ Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186525.html Please document this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1023858] New: improvement for google-noto-fonts comment and typo fix
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023858 Bug ID: 1023858 Summary: improvement for google-noto-fonts comment and typo fix Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: During the Fedora meeting on 10 we observed there is some improvement for google-noto-fonts comments and also identified on typo. Actual results: Formatting typo on " ibus-typing-booster, latn-post, latn-pre input methods are not blacklisted anymore. " line And too much details for google-noto-fonts Expected results: I have updated https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_I18n_Beat please update this to git. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001329] New: ARM as primary Architecture
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001329 Bug ID: 1001329 Summary: ARM as primary Architecture Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dennis(a)ausil.us, jreznik(a)redhat.com, pbrobinson(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998560 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998560 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: ARM as primary Architecture For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary Make ARM a primary architecture. Add armv7hl to the i686 and x86_64 as arches that we build and support. This will mean that all packages supported by the ARM architecture must build for ARM to be released. With the release of Fedora 19 we have deprecated support for software floating support (ARMv5tel sfp) so the only proposed addition to primary architectures is currently ARMv7 hardware floating point 32 bit support (ARMv7 hfp 32bit). --- Additional comment from Dennis Gilmore on 2013-08-22 18:57:11 EDT --- we are building arm as primary, everything is on target right now. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/184962.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1008209] New: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for FreeIPA
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008209 Bug ID: 1008209 Summary: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for FreeIPA Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: abokovoy(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998502 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998502 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Transitive Trusts with Active Directory support for FreeIPA For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/IPAv3TransitiveTrusts FreeIPA will support transitive trusts with Active Directory --- Additional comment from Alexander Bokovoy on 2013-08-26 23:20:18 EDT --- I'm on vacation and will only be able to work fully on the feature starting September. ------------------------------------------------------------ Discusstion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185634.html Please document this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1008214] New: KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008214 Bug ID: 1008214 Summary: KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dvratil(a)redhat.com, jgrulich(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, kevin.kofler(a)chello.at, ltinkl(a)redhat.com, mbriza(a)redhat.com, rdieter(a)math.unl.edu, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, than(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998528 (kde-4.11), 995167 (lokalize), 995226 (kde-dev-utils), 996067 (kcron), 996068 (ksystemlog), 996069 (kuser), 1005133 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998528 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11 For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/KDE411 Rebase to version 4.11 of: the KDE Plasma Workspaces including the Plasma Desktop and Netbook workspaces, the KDE Applications and the KDE Platform. --- Additional comment from Lukáš Tinkl on 2013-08-26 08:54:02 EDT --- KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11 is in its final and fully testable state. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-27 11:11:30 EDT --- KDE team agreed to move to MODIFIED. ------------------------------------------------ Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001178.h… Please document this Change in the Release Notes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa December 2013