docs-qa December 2013

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
180 discussions

[Bug 1001353] New: No Default Sendmail
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001353 Bug ID: 1001353 Summary: No Default Sendmail Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998571 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998571 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Sendmail For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSendmail No longer install an MTA by default. (Specifically let's remove sendmail from @core and @standard comps groups.) Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186536.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1001347] New: NetworkManager Bonding Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001347 Bug ID: 1001347 Summary: NetworkManager Bonding Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dcbw(a)redhat.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998567 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998567 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: NetworkManager Bonding Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NetworkManagerBonding NetworkManager should be able to configure bond master interfaces with commonly used options and recognize their existing configuration on startup without disrupting their operation. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001214.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1036843] New: x2go section of Fedora 20 Release notes says "Closed Source" and infers x2go is based on closed source
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036843 Bug ID: 1036843 Summary: x2go section of Fedora 20 Release notes says "Closed Source" and infers x2go is based on closed source Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: dowdle(a)montanalinux.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Looking at the Fedora 20 release notes today I see that the x2go section (3.1.1.1) says: "X2Go is a featureful remote desktop solution based on NoMachine's now closed source NX project." While NoMachine's new NX4 product is indeed closed source / proprietary, x2go is NOT based on NX4. It is based on the GPL'ed NX3 libraries. I think that sentence is poorly worded and needs to be clarified. I'd recommend: "X2go is a featureful remote desktop solution based on a fork of NoMachine's GPL'ed NX3 libraries." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001355] New: No Default Syslog
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001355 Bug ID: 1001355 Summary: No Default Syslog Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998573 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998573 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Syslog For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog No longer install a traditional syslog service by default. (Specifically, remove rsyslog from the @core or @standard groups in comps.) Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185329.html Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1021138] New: Sugar 0.100 (1.0)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021138 Bug ID: 1021138 Summary: Sugar 0.100 (1.0) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pbrobinson(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998549 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998549 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Sugar 0.100 (1.0) For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Sugar-0.100 Update Sugar to the new upstream 0.100 (1.0) release. --- Additional comment from Peter Robinson on 2013-08-23 05:48:46 EDT --- Feature is substantially complete. We're still awaiting the upstream final 0.100 (or 1.0) release but it's all working in Fedora on the current latest release --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:17 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100% Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1]. All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required bug state at this point is ON_QA. As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik). [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule --------------------- Tracking bug for documenting this Change in the Release Notes. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998549 [Bug 998549] Sugar 0.100 (1.0) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1021137] New: typo? "acpi_rspd" should probably be "acpi_rsdp"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jan '14

02 Jan '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021137 Bug ID: 1021137 Summary: typo? "acpi_rspd" should probably be "acpi_rsdp" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide Assignee: sparks(a)redhat.com Reporter: hugh(a)mimosa.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: sparks(a)redhat.com Description of problem: "acpi_rspd" should probably be "acpi_rsdp" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Revision 18.4 Tue 11 March 2013 Eric Christensen <http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/UEFI_Secure_Boot_…> Additional info: In section 1.5.1 there is a bullet point: the acpi_rspd command line option, which is used to specify custom ACPI data When I google for acpi_rspd, it suggests that I probably meant acpi_rsdp. If I insist, all the hits seem to be derived from the UEFI-secure-boot-guide (some are amusing). So I conclude that this spelling is a typo. OT: is there a reason that this document is filed under Fedora 18 (I'm using Fedora 19)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008194] New: Enlightenment
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Dec '13

21 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008194 Bug ID: 1008194 Summary: Enlightenment Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, metherid(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 954132 (Enlightenment-Tracker), 998517 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998517 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Enlightenment For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Enlightenment Enlightenment 0.17 a new stable release has been released after 12 years or so of development. As many desktops are being landed on Fedora, Integrating Enlightenment in Fedora can not only enlarge the number of available desktops in Fedora, but also improve user experiences and give users another choice of Desktop Environment. ------------------------ Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001210.h… Please document this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1021178] New: The instructions for burning an ISO to disk only cover Gnome
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '13

20 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021178 Bug ID: 1021178 Summary: The instructions for burning an ISO to disk only cover Gnome Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-burning-isos Severity: low Assignee: zach(a)oglesby.co Reporter: joe(a)zeff.us QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The instructions for burning an ISO under Linux only cover Gnome. There should at least be some information on how this is done under KDE, Xfce and LDXE. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: 100$ Steps to Reproduce: 1.Use a DE other than Gnome 2.Look for information here on burning an ISO Actual results: Nothing Expected results: Somewhat more comprehensive coverage Additional info: Yes, I understand that Fedora is Gnome-centric, but there should, at the very least, be an attempt to cover the other most popular DEs. As far as the more obscure selections go, it's probably safe to say that if you know enough to install it and get it working properly, you probably know enough not to need help from this page. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1043943] New: Request to publish French translation of F20 Release Notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '13

20 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043943 Bug ID: 1043943 Summary: Request to publish French translation of F20 Release Notes Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jfenal(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: French translations of the Release Notes are not yet published on docs.fp.org, while translation is at 100%, and proofreading near completion. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1043295] New: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Czech translation ready to be published
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Dec '13

20 Dec '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043295 Bug ID: 1043295 Summary: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Czech translation ready to be published Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: The Czech translation of Fedora Burning ISO images to disc guide has been prepared in the Transifex. Please publish it. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 6

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa December 2013